You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Peer Review Congress Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts
Michael L. Callaham; William G. Baxt; Joseph F. Waeckerle; Robert L. Wears
JAMA 1998; 280: 229-231.
[Abstract][Full text][PDF]
Peer Review Congress What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
Nick Black; Susan van Rooyen; Fiona Godlee; Richard Smith; Stephen Evans
JAMA 1998; 280: 231-233.
[Abstract][Full text][PDF]
Peer Review Congress Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Fiona Godlee; Catharine R. Gale; Christopher N. Martyn
JAMA 1998; 280: 237-240.
[Abstract][Full text][PDF]
Peer Review Congress Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Amy C. Justice; Mildred K. Cho; Margaret A. Winker; Jesse A. Berlin; Drummond Rennie; and the PEER Investigators
JAMA 1998; 280: 240-242.
[Abstract][Full text][PDF]
Peer Review Congress Masking Author Identity in Peer Review: What Factors Influence Masking Success?
Mildred K. Cho; Amy C. Justice; Margaret A. Winker; Jesse A. Berlin; Joseph F. Waeckerle; Michael L. Callaham; Drummond Rennie; and the PEER Investigators
JAMA 1998; 280: 243-245.
[Abstract][Full text][PDF]
Peer Review Congress US and Non-US Submissions: An Analysis of Reviewer Bias