 |
 |

Histamine and Glucagon Tests in Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma
Sheldon G. Sheps, MD;
Frank T. Maher, MD
JAMA. 1968;205(13):895-899.
Abstract
 |  |
The glucagon hydrochloride test of Lawrence was compared with the standard cold pressor-histamine test in 12 patients with pheochromocytoma and in 35 control patients without tumor. Urinary and blood catecholamine levels and the values for urinary vanilmandelic acid and total metanephrine were also determined. One patient without a tumor had a pressor response after receiving histamine; none had a pressor response after receiving glucagon. Eleven patients with tumor were given 1 mg of glucagon; six had a positive pressor response, and four of these six had a positive response after receiving histamine as well. One patient with tumor responded positively to histamine but not to 0.5 mg of glucagon. Although determination of the level of urinary metanephrine remains the preferred screening test for pheochromocytoma, when adjunctive studies are desired we recommend the cold pressor-glucagon test (1 mg) instead of histamine as the standard provocative pharmacologic test for pheochromocytoma.
Author Affiliations
From the sections of medicine (Dr. Sheps) and clinical pathology (Dr. Maher), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn.
Footnotes
Reprint requests to Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn 55901.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Improved Safety of Glucagon Testing for Pheochromocytoma by Prior {alpha}-Receptor Blockade: A Controlled Trial in a Patient With a Mixed Ganglioneuroma/Pheochromocytoma
Elliott et al.
Arch Intern Med 1989;149:214-216.
ABSTRACT
Hypertensive Crisis Induced by Metoclopramide in Patient with Pheochromocytoma
Abe et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1984;35:122-128.
ABSTRACT
Glucagon-Blood Catecholamine Test: Use in Isolated and Familial Pheochromocytoma
Siqueira-Filho et al.
Arch Intern Med 1975;135:1227-1231.
ABSTRACT
Glucagon and Pheochromocytoma
LAWRENCE
ANN INTERN MED 1970;73:852-853.
ABSTRACT
|