You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 213 No. 11, September 14, 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Whither the Foreskin?

A Consideration of Routine Neonatal Circumcision

CAPT E. Noel Preston, MC

JAMA. 1970;213(11):1853-1858.


Abstract

Routine neonatal circumcision has been advocated as a means of preventing genitourinary diseases and genital cancers. However, the procedure has been found to be of questionable benefit and to be associated with both immediate and delayed risks and complications. These in turn may produce undesirable psychologic, sexual, and medico-legal difficulties. Circumcision is considered with respect to carcinoma of the cervix, penis, and prostate; there is little evidence that circumcision of the newborn affords protection against subsequent development of these cancers in individuals who practice good personal hygiene.



Author Affiliations

USAF

From the Pediatric Services, USAF Hospital, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California.


Footnotes

Opinions expressed in this paper are not necessarily those of the Department of Defense or the Department of the Air Force.

Reprint requests to 3644-E Chamblee-Tucker Rd, Atlanta 30341.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Incidence of Meatal Stenosis following Neonatal Circumcision in a Primary Care Setting
Van Howe
CLIN PEDIATR 2006;45:49-54.
ABSTRACT  

Below the Belt: Doctors, Debate, and the Ongoing American Discussion of Routine Neonatal Male Circumcision
Dritsas
Bulletin of Science Technology Society 2001;21:297-311.
ABSTRACT  

Circumcision in the United States: Prevalence, Prophylactic Effects, and Sexual Practice
Laumann et al.
JAMA 1997;277:1052-1057.
ABSTRACT  

Circumcision and Genital Hygiene
PRESTON
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1986;140:969-969.
ABSTRACT  

Factors Affecting the Practice of Circumcision
Patel et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1982;136:634-636.
ABSTRACT  

Routine Neonatal Circumcisions
HERRERA and TROUERN-TREND
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1979;133:1069-1070.
ABSTRACT  

Circumcision-Reply
GELLIS
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1979;133:1079-1080.
ABSTRACT  

Circumcision Complication: Reaction to Treatment of Local Hemorrhage with Topical Epinephrine in High Concentration
Denton et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 1978;17:285-286.
 

Modern Ritualistic Surgery: A Layman's View of Nonritual Neonatal Circumcision
Zimmer
CLIN PEDIATR 1977;16:503-506.
 

The Foreskin Saga
Harnes
JAMA 1971;217:1241-1242.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1970 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.