You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 229 No. 13, September 23, 1974 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Current Medical Practice and the Food and Drug Administration

Some Evidence for the Existing Gap

Gregory R. Mundy, MD; Lawrence Fleckenstein, PharmD; John M. Mazzullo, MD; Pavur R. Sundaresan, MB; Michael Weintraub, MD; Louis Lasagna, MD

JAMA. 1974;229(13):1744-1748.


Abstract

The manner of use of three prescription drugs for hospitalized patients (cephalexin, allopurinol, and propranolol hydrochloride) was compared with the labeling recommendations that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Each drug was prescribed frequently for therapeutic indications not mentioned in the approved labeling (cephalexin in 78.3% of cases, allopurinol in 57.1%, and propranolol in 64.7%). Thus, a gap has developed between current medical practice and FDA-approved recommendations for therapeutic use. We suggest that for cephalexin and allopurinol, the FDA-approved recommendations agreed with the current medical literature, and the prescribing habits of physicians were inappropriate. With propranolol, however, the FDA-approved recommendations were lagging behind both good medical practice and the current medical literature. The implications of these findings are discussed with respect to prescribing habits and drug regulation.

(JAMA 229:1744-1748, 1974)



Author Affiliations

From the departments of medicine (Drs. Mazzullo, Weintraub, and Lasagna), pharmacology, and toxicology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester (NY).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642 (Dr. Mundy).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Use of Food and Drug Administration Approved Medications for Unlabeled (Off-Label) Uses: The Legal and Ethical Implications
Torres
Arch Dermatol 1994;130:32-36.
ABSTRACT  

The Use of Drugs for Unlabeled Indications
Erickson et al.
JAMA 1980;243:1543-1546.
ABSTRACT  

Digoxin-Prescribing: Mostly Good News
Weintraub et al.
JAMA 1979;242:445-448.
ABSTRACT  

Oral Contraceptive Patient Information: A Questionnaire Study of Attitudes, Knowledge, and Preferred Information Sources
Fleckenstein et al.
JAMA 1976;235:1331-1336.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1974 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.