You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 231 No. 12, March 24, 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Treatment of Circulatory Shock

Use of Sympathomimetic and Related Vasoactive Agents

Max H. Weil, MD, PhD; Herbert Shubin, MD; Richard Carlson, MD, PhD

JAMA. 1975;231(12):1280-1286.


Abstract

Reduction of effective blood flow represents the primary disturbance accounting for circulatory shock. Four categories of circulatory shock are identified: cardiogenic, hypovolemic, distributive, and obstructive. The pharmacology and clinical implications for treatment of shock with vasoactive drugs are reviewed in this context.

Except for epinephrine, when it is used for treatment of anaphylactic shock, there is no specific indication for the routine use of {alpha}- or β-adrenergic receptor agonists. These agents may increase blood pressure or cardiac output, but nutritive flow is not necessarily improved. Comparable limitations are observed with {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blocking agents. However, selective effects on the myocardium and on the resistance, exchange, and capacitance vessels may be advantageous as an interim and complementary measure. Since vasoactive drugs frequently intensify the fundamental defect accounting for perfusion failure, their selective rather than routine employment is mandatory.

(JAMA 231:1280-1286, 1975)



Author Affiliations

From the Center for the Critically III, and the Shock Research Unit, University of Southern California School of Medicine, the Los Angeles County/USC Medical Center, and the Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, Los Angeles.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Center for the Critically III, University of Southern California School of Medicine, 1300 N Vermont Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90027 (Dr. Weil).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effectiveness of Right Heart Catheterization: Time for a Randomized Trial
Schlichtig
JAMA 1997;277:112-112.
ABSTRACT  

Aspects of the Management of Shock
SHINE et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1980;93:723-734.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.