You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 240 No. 25, December 15, 1978 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Videotape Aids Informed Consent Decision

Galen L. Barbour, MD; Michael J. Blumenkrantz, MD

JAMA. 1978;240(25):2741-2742.


Abstract

Obtaining informed consent for clinical investigations represents a major legal, ethical, and moral consideration in human experimentation. Mechanisms for informing the patient vary widely, and usually no system exists to confirm the degree of information retained by the patient. A Veterans Administration Cooperative Study, begun in 1975, has used a videotape information package in addition to a standard written consent form to ensure uniformity. Each presentation was followed by a questionnaire to assess the amount of material learned before attempting randomization. Repeated showings were occasionally necessary and did not affect the rate of randomization. A videotape presentation, especially in cooperative studies, ensures uniformity, makes allowance for varying educational levels of patients, and provides documentation of the degree of informed consent.

(JAMA 240:2741-2742, 1978)



Footnotes

Self-Dialysis Training, Veterans Administration, Little Rock Hospital Division, Little Rock, Ark.

Reprint requests to Self-Dialysis Training, Veterans Administration Hospital Division, 300 E Roosevelt Rd, Little Rock, AR 72206 (Dr Barbour).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Readability Standards for Informed-Consent Forms as Compared with Actual Readability
Paasche-Orlow et al.
NEJM 2003;348:721-726.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Use of Multimedia in the Informed Consent Process
Jimison et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1998;5:245-256.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genetic Testing for Susceptibility to Adult-Onset Cancer: The Process and Content of Informed Consent
Geller et al.
JAMA 1997;277:1467-1474.
ABSTRACT  

Readability of the Childhood Immunization Information Forms
Melman et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994;148:642-644.
ABSTRACT  

Informed Consent for Treatment of Childhood Cancer: Factors Affecting Parents' Decision Making
Ruccione et al.
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing 1991;8:112-121.
ABSTRACT  

Readability of Informed Consent Forms for Research in a Veterans Administration Medical Center
Baker and Taub
JAMA 1983;250:2646-2648.
ABSTRACT  

What We Do and Do Not Know About Informed Consent
Meisel and Roth
JAMA 1981;246:2473-2477.
ABSTRACT  

How Readable Are Subject Consent Forms?
Morrow
JAMA 1980;244:56-58.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1978 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.