You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 242 No. 10, September 7, 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  BRIEF REPORTS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Limitations of Surgical Methods of Pericardial Drainage

Echocardiographic Observations

Premindra A. N. Chandraratna, MD; Wilbert S. Aronow, MD

JAMA. 1979;242(10):1062-1063.


Abstract

To assess the efficacy of surgical methods of pericardial drainage in preventing the accumulation of pericardial effusion, we performed M-mode and cross-sectional echocardiograms in 26 patients before and one week after the creation of a pericardial window or leaving the pericardium open after cardiac surgery. A pericardial window was created in six patients (group 1) who had pericardial effusions. Group 2 consisted of 20 patients who had heart surgery. Echocardiography disclosed moderate or large pericardial effusions preoperatively in all group 1 patients but in none of the group 2 patients. Following operation, three of the group 1 patients had complete clearing of pericardial effusion, while three showed reaccumulation. In group 2, thirteen patients had either no effusion or a small effusion. Seven patients had moderate or large pericardial effusions that were located posterior to the heart; only one had an anterior pericardial effusion. Cross-sectional echocardiography showed posterior loculation of effusion in six of the seven patients. Pericardial drainage is not always effective in preventing accumulation of pericardial effusions.

(JAMA 242:1062-1063, 1979)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Cardiology, Medical Service, Long Beach (Calif) Veterans Administration Hospital; and the University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Division of Cardiology, Long Beach Veterans Administration Hospital, 5901 E Seventh St, Long Beach, CA 90822 (Dr Chandraratna).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Pericardial Disease
Chandraratna
JAMA 1983;250:2677-2680.
ABSTRACT  

Iatrogenic Cushing's Syndrome After Intrapericardial Corticosteroid Therapy
GRUBB et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1981;95:706-707.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.