You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 242 No. 12, September 21, 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Contact Dermatitis to Neomycin Sulfate

James J. Leyden, MD; Albert M. Kligman, MD, PhD

JAMA. 1979;242(12):1276-1278.


Abstract

The prevalence of contact allergic dermatitis and nonallergic irritant reactions to neomycin sulfate was determined in a large group of young adults who had a noteworthy exposure to topical antibiotics. Only two subjects (0.09%) had contact allergy proved by closed patch testing, while 20 (0.9%) had nonallergic irritant reactions to 20% neomycin sulfate and 17 (0.78%) had nonallergic reactions to one of the hydrophilic ointment bases. In a separate population of 653 children referred for diagnostic patch testing, only one subject had contact allergy to neomycin. All three subjects who had reactions had a history of repeated use of neomycin on chronically damaged skin. These results support the conclusion that intermittent use of neomycin on minor cuts and wounds is not associated with an excessive rate of sensitization.

(JAMA 242:1276-1278, 1979)



Author Affiliations

From the Duhring Laboratories, Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Duhring Laboratories, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Suite 203, 3500 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (Dr Leyden).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Does single application of topical chloramphenicol to high risk sutured wounds reduce incidence of wound infection after minor surgery? Prospective randomised placebo controlled double blind trial
Heal et al.
BMJ 2009;338:a2812-a2812.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Addressing Parents' Concerns: Do Vaccines Contain Harmful Preservatives, Adjuvants, Additives, or Residuals?
Offit and Jew
Pediatrics 2003;112:1394-1397.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Topical Antibiotics in Dermatology
Hirschmann
Arch Dermatol 1988;124:1691-1700.
ABSTRACT  

Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Children
Weston and Weston
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1984;138:932-936.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.