You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 242 No. 21, November 23, 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Anemia. Textbook vs practice

R. Carmel, T. A. Denson and B. Mussell

Anemia, particularly if mild, is ignored frequently. We conducted a questionnaire survey of 252 physicians and medical students to verify this impression and to explore the reasons for it. A cumulative 40% to 57% depending on the hypothetical patients' circumstances) of respondents chose to investigate anemia only at hemoglobin levels too low for the accepted criteria in female patients; a striking 78% to 89% did so in male patients. Only 54% and 30% knew the correct textbook definition of anemia for women and men, respectively. More importantly, 35% to 60% demonstrated criteria for choosing to investigate anemia were lower than even their own perception of the textbook definition. Little difference existed among the various physician subgroups in their responses. The discrepancy between what physicians do and what they are taught appears to arise from several factors, of which lack of knowledge is only one.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.