You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 242 No. 7, August 17, 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Emergency Treatment of Asthma

A Comparison of Two Treatment Regimens

Gordon W. Josephson, MD; Ellen J. MacKenzie, MS; Paul S. Lietman, MD, PhD; Geoffrey Gibson, PhD

JAMA. 1979;242(7):639-643.


Abstract

The effectiveness of epinephrine was compared to that of a combination of epinephrine and aminophylline in the initial treatment of acute asthma. Forty-four patients with 51 episodes of acute asthma were evaluated. Peak flow spirometry served as an objective measure of airway resistance, and theophylline levels were determined at fixed intervals throughout the study. Epinephrine and aminophylline were not found to be superior to epinephrine alone. There was no correlation between mean serum theophylline levels and the magnitude of improvement. Rapidity of emergency department discharge and frequency of admission was independent of treatment method. The failure of epinephrine-aminophylline to effect more rapid or profound improvement in pulmonary function might suggest that epinephrine alone, or an equivalent sympathomimetic is a rational choice in the initial treatment of acute asthma.

(JAMA 242:639-643, 1979)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital (Dr Josephson); the Division of Emergency Medicine (Dr Josephson) and the Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (Dr Lietman), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; and the Health Sciences Research and Development Center, Johns Hopkins University (Ms MacKenzie and Dr Gibson), Baltimore.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Emergency Services, Memorial Hospital, 119 Belmont St, Worcester, MA 01605 (Dr Josephson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Randomised controlled trial of aminophylline for severe acute asthma
Yung and South
Arch. Dis. Child. 1998;79:405-410.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Status Asthmaticus
Jederlinic and Irwin
J Intensive Care Med 1989;4:166-184.
 

Aminophylline Treatment in Severe, Acute Asthma: A Meta-analysis
Littenberg
JAMA 1988;259:1678-1684.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.