You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 243 No. 4, January 25, 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  SPECIAL COMMUNICATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (62)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diagnostic Evaluation of Headache

Impact of Computerized Tomography and Cost-effectiveness

Eric B. Larson, MD, MPH; Gilbert S. Omenn, MD, PhD; Howard Lewis

JAMA. 1980;243(4):359-362.


Abstract

One hundred sixty-one highly selected patients with headache were studied to assess the impact of computerized tomography (CT) on diagnostic evaluation and to determine cost-effectiveness of neurodiagnostic evaluation of headache. Fewer nuclide brain scans were performed after availability of CT, but diagnostic charges stayed about the same. A careful history and physical and neurological examinations were adequate screens to detect intracranial mass lesions or systemic disease associated with headache. In patients with normal findings from neurological examination, no clinically important abnormalities were detected by CT, skull roentgenogram, angiography, or nuclide brain scan. The cost of finding a case of brain tumor was estimated to be at least $1,265 for patients with abnormalities on neurological examination and $11,901 for patients with normal findings on neurological examination. Neurodiagnostic evaluation of headache patients with normal findings from neurological examination is expensive and was clinically unrewarding in this series.

(JAMA 243:359-362, 1980)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Virginia Mason Research Foundation, Seattle. Dr Omenn is currently the assistant director for Human Resources and Social and Economic Affairs, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Offices of the President, Washington, DC.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Department of Medicine RG-20, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 (Dr Larson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Does this patient with headache have a migraine or need neuroimaging?
Detsky et al.
JAMA 2006;296:1274-1283.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

US GUIDELINES ON NEUROIMAGING IN PATIENTS WITH NON-ACUTE HEADACHE: A COMMENTARY
Sudlow
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002;72:ii16-18.
FULL TEXT  

Screening CT of the Brain Determined by CD4 Count in HIV-Positive Patients Presenting with Headache
Graham III et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2000;21:451-454.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictors of Intracranial Pathologic Findings in Patients Who Seek Emergency Care Because of Headache
Ramirez-Lassepas et al.
Arch Neurol 1997;54:1506-1509.
ABSTRACT  

Misdiagnosis of Symptomatic Cerebral Aneurysm: Prevalence and Correlation With Outcome at Four Institutions
Mayer et al.
Stroke 1996;27:1558-1563.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effectiveness of Cerebral Imaging in the Diagnosis of Chronic Headache
Weingarten et al.
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:2457-2462.
ABSTRACT  

Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analyses in the Medical Literature: Are the Methods Being Used Correctly?
Udvarhelyi et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1992;116:238-244.
ABSTRACT  

Dementia in Elderly Outpatients: A Prospective Study
LARSON et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1984;100:417-423.
ABSTRACT  

Computed Tomography and EEG in Patients Without Focal Neurologic Findings
Rosenberg et al.
Arch Neurol 1982;39:291-292.
ABSTRACT  

Computed Tomography in Patients with Psychiatric Illnesses: Advantage of a "Rule-In" Approach
LARSON et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1981;95:360-364.
ABSTRACT  

Computed Tomography Brain Scanning in Alcohol Withdrawal Seizures: Value of the Neurologic Examination
FEUSSNER et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1981;94:519-522.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.