You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 245 No. 2, January 9, 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Control of hepatitis B infection. The role of surveillance and an isolation hemodialysis center

G. R. Najem, D. B. Louria, I. S. Thind, M. A. Lavenhar, D. J. Gocke, S. E. Baskin, A. M. Miller, H. J. Frankel, J. Notkin, M. G. Jacobs and B. Weiner

A 3 1/4-year study assessed intervention approaches for hemodialysis-associated hepatitis. A 12-month retrospective study was followed by one year of prospective surveillance (during which attention to hygienic techniques was encouraged) and then by a 15-month period during which antigen-positive cases were transferred from study centers to an isolation hemodialysis center (IHL). The incidence of hepatitis B infection (HBI) fell 35.9% in study centers during surveillance; this was followed by a 50.0% drop during the IHC phase. The total 67.9% drop during the entire study period was statistically highly significant; the IHC contributed significantly more to the total drop than did surveillance alone. At comparison units, HBI increased 97.9% during the same period. This study indicates that HBI incidence can be markedly reduced by a combination of surveillance and assignment of antigen-positive patients to a separate dialysis unit.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.