You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 245 No. 2, January 9, 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Control of Hepatitis B Infection

The Role of Surveillance and an Isolation Hemodialysis Center

G. Reza Najem, MD, PhD; Donald B. Louria, MD; Inderjit S. Thind, MD, DrPH; Marvin A. Lavenhar, PhD; David J. Gocke, MD; Stuart E. Baskin, MD; Ann Marie Miller; Howard J. Frankel, MD; Joel Notkin, MD; Martin G. acobs, MD; Barry Weiner, MD

JAMA. 1981;245(2):153-157.


Abstract

A 31/4-year study assessed intervention approaches for hemodialysis-associated hepatitis. A 12-month retrospective study was followed by one year of prospective surveillance (during which attention to hygienic techniques was encouraged) and then by a 15-month period during which antigen-positive cases were transferred from study centers to an isolation hemodialysis center (IHC). The incidence of hepatitis B infection (HBI) fell 35.9% in study centers during surveillance; this was followed by a 50.0% drop during the IHC phase. The total 67.9% drop during the entire study period was statistically highly significant; the IHC contributed significantly more to the total drop than did surveillance alone. At comparison units, HBI increased 97.9% during the same period. This study indicates that HBI incidence can be markedly reduced by a combination of surveillance and assignment of antigen-positive patients to a separate dialysis unit.

(JAMA 1981;245:153-157)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, College of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark (Drs Najem, Louria, Thind, Lavenhar, and Baskin, and Ms Miller); Rutgers Medical School, Piscataway, NJ (Dr Gocke); East Orange (NJ) General Hospital (Dr Frankel); Dialysis Centers of Biomedical Life Support Systems, Pine Brook, NJ (Dr Notkin); St Barnabas Hospital, Livingston, NJ (Dr Jacob); and Jersey City (NJ) Medical Center (Dr Weiner).


Footnotes

Presented in part at the 12th Annual Meeting of the Society for Epidemiological Research, New Haven, Conn, June 14, 1979.

Reprint requests to Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, 100 Bergen St, Newark, NJ 07103 (Dr Najem).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prevalence of Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Type III Antibodies Among Patients in Dialysis Programs at a University Hospital
MORRISON et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1986;104:805-807.
ABSTRACT  

Hepatitis B Vaccine Use in Chronic Hemodialysis Centers in the United States
Alter et al.
JAMA 1985;254:3200-3202.
ABSTRACT  

Hepatitis B Virus Transmission Associated with a Multiple-Dose Vial in a Hemodialysis Unit
ALTER et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1983;99:330-333.
ABSTRACT  

The Hepatitis B Saga
Hussey
JAMA 1981;245:1317-1318.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.