This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Kent Crossley, MD; Linda Couch Gardner, RRA

JAMA. 1981;245(7):722-726.

Abstract
The use of antibiotic prophylaxis was prospectively evaluated in 1,021 surgical patients from 27 hospitals in metropolitan Minnesota. The majority of patients had undergone general surgical (23%), obstetric and gynecologic (13%), orthopedic (26%), and urologic (12%) procedures. One half of the courses of antibiotic prophylaxis were given to patients undergoing clean (class 1) surgery. Antibiotics were first administered in the four hours preceding the start of surgery in only 41% of the patients. The mean duration of prophylaxis was 3.4 days. About one third of the patients received prophylaxis for more than 72 hours; this group accounted for 65% of patient-days of antibiotic administration. More than one half of the patients received a cephalosporin. Analysis of patient charges suggests that 18% to 50% of the cost of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis might be saved by limiting the duration of drug administration.

(JAMA 1981;245:722-726)

Author Affiliations
Task Force on Prophylactic Antibiotics in Surgery

From the Foundation for Health Care Evaluation, Minneapolis.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to St Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, St Paul, MN 55101 (Dr Crossley).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prophylactic Antibiotherapy in Abdominal Surgery: First- vs Third-Generation Cephalosporins
Rotman et al.
Arch Surg 1989;124:323-327.
ABSTRACT