You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 246 No. 21, November 27, 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  SPECIAL COMMUNICATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

What We Do and Do Not Know About Informed Consent

Alan Meisel, JD; Loren H. Roth, MD, MPH

JAMA. 1981;246(21):2473-2477.


Abstract

In an effort to validate the common criticisms of informed consent, we have reviewed representative empirical studies and have found that for a variety of methodological, conceptual, and pragmatic reasons, empirical findings currently offer no conclusive evidence that informed consent either is or is not feasible. Thus, it is imperative that authorities charged with making law and policy involving informed consent not rely on these studies as authoritative.

(JAMA 1981;246:2473-2477)



Author Affiliations

From the Schools of Law (Mr Meisel) and Medicine (Dr Roth and Mr Meisel), Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Law and Psychiatry Program, University of Pittsburgh.


Footnotes

Read before the Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, San Francisco, May 8, 1980.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Why effective consent presupposes autonomous authorisation: a counterorthodox argument.
Epstein
J. Med. Ethics 2006;32:342-345.
FULL TEXT  

Ethical Concerns in Schizophrenia Research: Looking Back and Moving Forward
Wilson and Stanley
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:30-36.
FULL TEXT  

Informed Consent and the Capacity for Voluntarism
Roberts
Focus 2003;1:407-414.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Ethics Teaching in Psychiatric Supervision
Roberts et al.
Focus 2003;1:436-444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Informed Consent and the Capacity for Voluntarism
Roberts
Am. J. Psychiatry 2002;159:705-712.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Use of Professional Disclosure in Rehabilitation Counseling
Shaw and Tarvydas
Rehabil Couns Bull 2001;45:40-47.
ABSTRACT  

Improving Understanding of Research Consent Disclosures Among Persons With Mental Illness
Stiles et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2001;52:780-785.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Informed Consent: a New Measure of Understanding Among Research Subjects
Joffe et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:139-147.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fair Allocation of Intensive Care Unit Resources
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1997;156:1282-1301.
FULL TEXT  

Determinants of Parental Authorization for Involvement of Newborn Infants in Clinical Trials
Zupancic et al.
Pediatrics 1997;99:e6-e6.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Writing/Speaking on Comprehension of Information for Informed Consent
Sorrell
West J Nurs Res 1991;13:110-122.
 

Patient Attitudes to Discussing Life-Sustaining Treatment
Lo et al.
Arch Intern Med 1986;146:1613-1615.
ABSTRACT  

American College of Physicians Ethics Manual: Part II: Research, Other Ethical Issues. Recommended Reading.
ANN INTERN MED 1984;101:263-274.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.