You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 247 No. 2, January 8, 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Mammographic parenchymal patterns. Risk indicator for breast cancer?

L. Tabar and P. B. Dean

Mammographic parenchymal patterns, originally presented as a new risk factor for breast cancer, have been prospectively studied in a large (27,157 examinations) consecutive screening population. Although there is a significantly higher risk of breast cancer in the so-called dysplastic breasts (P2 and DY pattern groups), the classification is of little practical value, as more than 72% of the cancers in the prevalent population were found in the so-called low-risk breasts (N1 and P1 pattern groups). A similar trend occurred at repeated screening of younger women, in which most of the "incident" cancers were found in the "low-risk" breasts. These patterns should not be used to influence patient management or screening programs.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparison of a New and Existing Method of Mammographic Density Measurement: Intramethod Reliability and Associations with Known Risk Factors
McCormack et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1148-1154.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis.
McCormack and dos Santos Silva
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1159-1169.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk
Harvey and Bovbjerg
Radiology 2004;230:29-41.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Wolfe's Parenchymal Pattern and Percentage of the Breast with Mammographic Densities: Redundant or Complementary Classifications?
Brisson et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:728-732.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Detection of Change in Mammographic Density
Stone et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:625-630.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Heritability of Mammographic Density, a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer
Boyd et al.
NEJM 2002;347:886-894.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.