You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 247 No. 7, February 19, 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Fetal and Infant Mortality in Norway and the United States

J. David Erickson, PhD; Tor Bjerkedal, MD

JAMA. 1982;247(7):987-991.


Abstract

Relative to the countries of northern Europe, the United States has a high crude infant mortality rate. We compared the United States' fetal and infant mortality rates with those of Norway, a nation that is internationally recognized for having a low infant mortality. Norwegian birth-weight-specific rates were applied to the US birth populations, yielding adjusted rates. The adjusted rates, which are the crude rates that would have resulted in the United States if the Norwegian birth-weight-specific rates had been in force, were generally higher than the US rates that were actually observed. Thus, the major reason for the United States' poor international rank is probably its unfavorable birth-weight distributions, and any major improvement in the United States' international standing will likely await a reduction in the proportion of high-risk, low-weight births.

(JAMA 1982;247:987-991)



Author Affiliations

From the Chronic Diseases Division, Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta (Dr Erickson), and the Institute of Hygiene, University of Oslo (Dr Bjerkedal).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the Chronic Disease Division, Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333 (Dr Erickson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Birth Weight and Perinatal Mortality: A Comparison of the United States and Norway
Wilcox et al.
JAMA 1995;273:709-711.
ABSTRACT  

Race- and Rank-Specific Infant Mortality in a US Military Population
Rawlings and Weir
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1992;146:313-316.
ABSTRACT  

Trends in Postneonatal Mortality in the United States: 1962 Through 1978
Khoury et al.
JAMA 1984;252:367-372.
ABSTRACT  

Lethal Congenital Anomalies as a Cause of Birth-Weight--Specific Neonatal Mortality
Goldenberg et al.
JAMA 1983;250:513-515.
ABSTRACT  

A Model for Studying the Pathogenesis and Incidence of Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Miller
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1983;137:323-327.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.