You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 248 No. 11, September 17, 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (39)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Staging of Breast Cancer and Survival Rates

An Assessment Based on 50 Years of Experience With Radical Mastectomy

Donald J. Ferguson, MD; Paul Meier, PhD; Theodore Karrison, MS; Peter J. Dawson, MD; Francis H. Straus, MD; Florence E. Lowenstein

JAMA. 1982;248(11):1337-1341.


Abstract

The correlation of staging criteria for mammary carcinoma with the curability of primary and recurrent local and regional lesions was assessed by follow-up after 1,259 consecutive radical mastectomies performed in women under age 70 between 1927 and 1978. Using a staging scheme revised in the light of our experience, the incidence of recurrence by 20 years was 34% ±2.7% for pathological stage I, 65% ±2.6% for stage II, and 83% ±2.5% for stage III. Recurrence after 20 years was observed in one of 178 patients. After treatment of local recurrence, three of 51 patients survived 20 years. By restriction of entry into clinical or pathological stages I and II, currently employed revisions of staging criteria appear to increase survival in all stages, while placing patients with possibly curable lesions in stages III and IV.

(JAMA 1982;248:1337-1341)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Dr Ferguson), Statistics (Dr Meier and Mr Karrison), and Pathology (Drs Straus and Dawson) and the Tumor Registry (Ms Lowenstein), University of Chicago.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Box 402, University of Chicago, 950 E 59th St, Chicago, IL 60637 (Dr Ferguson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical Progression of Breast Cancer Malignant Behavior: What to Expect and When to Expect it
Heimann and Hellman
JCO 2000;18:591-591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Separating Favorable from Unfavorable Prognostic Markers in Breast Cancer: The Role of E-Cadherin
Heimann et al.
Cancer Res. 2000;60:298-304.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Treatment of Breast Cancer: II. A 20-Year Follow-up and Reappraisal of the En Bloc Principle
Peterson
Arch Surg 1988;123:1059-1062.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.