You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 248 No. 18, November 12, 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  SPECIAL COMMUNICATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reliability and Validity of American Medical Association's Guide to Ratings of Permanent Impairment

David S. Gloss, PhD, MPH; Miriam Gayle Wardle, PhD

JAMA. 1982;248(18):2292-2296.


Abstract

We examined the American Medical Association's Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment rating schedule to determine whether this guide provided a reliable and valid assessment of hand impairment. A sample of 118 patients with permanent hand impairment was assessed using the guide. In addition, each patient underwent tests of finger dexterity, hand strength, hand-eye coordination, and the rate of manipulation. The reliability, based on the correlation between the two raters, was 0.75. For the injured hand, psychomotor test scores were highly correlated with the rating of permanent impairment in all cases. These differences were statistically significant for approximately two thirds of the cases. The guide's ratings showed both substantial reliability and accuracy with the various tests of hand function.

(JAMA 1982;248:2292-2296)



Author Affiliations

From the Communication Systems Division Sylvania Systems Group, GTE Products Corporation, Needham Heights, Mass (Dr Gloss); and the School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Mass (Dr Wardle).


Footnotes

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of GTE Products Corporation.

Reprint requests to Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 (Dr Wardle).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impairment and Disability Evaluations: Understanding the Process
Melhorn
JBJS 2001;83:1905-1911.
FULL TEXT  

Recommendations to Guide Revision of the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment
Spieler et al.
JAMA 2000;283:519-523.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Correlation between the Measures of Impairment, According to the Modified System of the American Medical Association, and Function
MCCARTHY et al.
JBJS 1998;80:1034-42.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.