Health care technology and the inevitability of resource allocation and rationing decisions. Part I

R. W. Evans

Increasingly, it is recognized that resources available to meet health care needs are limited. Recently, this has been evidenced by reductions in federally funded health care programs and the leveling off of research funds made available to the National Institutes of Health. The problem of severely constrained resources is likely to become more acute, given new medical technology and the high cost of medical care. It is now apparent that both resource allocation and resource-rationing decisions will become inevitable, since not all persons with catastrophic or complicated medical conditions will be able to benefit from medical technology. While the careful assessment of health care technology can conceivably increase the efficiency of the health care delivery system, the methods by which allocation and rationing decisions are made must be improved. In doing so, it will ultimately be essential for this society to come to grips with life and death issues in a manner to which it is not accustomed.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Health-Care Rationing: Critical Features, Ordinary Language, and Meaning
Russell
J Law Med Ethics 2002;30:82-87.
 

The effects of hospice interventions on behaviors, discomfort, and physical complications of end stage dementia nursing home residents
Kovach et al.
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 1996;11:7-15.
ABSTRACT  

Controversies in Treatment: How can hospitals ration drugs? Drug rationing in a teaching hospital: a method to assign priorities
Bochner et al.
BMJ 1994;308:901-905.
FULL TEXT  

The Politics of Organ Transplantation: A Parable of Our Time
Rettig
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1989;14:191-227.
ABSTRACT  

Age as a Basis for Allocating Lifesaving Medical Resources: An Ethical Analysis
Kttner
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1988;13:405-423.
ABSTRACT  

Health Insurance Without Provider Influence: The Limits of Cost Containment
Goldberg and Greenberg
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1988;13:293-303.
ABSTRACT