You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 249 No. 19, May 20, 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  SPECIAL COMMUNICATION
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Employee Rubella Screening Programs in Arizona Hospitals

Jeffrey J. Sacks, MD, MPH; Barbara Olson, PhN; Jacqueline Soter, RN; Cheryl Clark

JAMA. 1983;249(19):2675-2678.


Abstract

One year after voluntary guidelines on rubella screening of hospital employees were issued by the Arizona Department of Health, a survey of 68 members of the Arizona Hospital Association was conducted, with an 81% response. Some form of employee rubella screening was present in only 49% of responding hospitals. Of the screening hospitals, 70% of programs had a mandatory aspect for selected employees. Administrative logistics, cost, problems encountered, and the quality and coverage of the program varied substantially among the different hospitals. Fewer than half of the screening hospitals had programs for physicians, students, or volunteers. Verbal histories of immunization or serological tests, although notoriously unreliable, were accepted by 14% of the screening hospitals. Half of the nonscreening hospitals plan to implement programs in the future. Reasons given for not establishing rubella screening programs include cost, no pediatric or obstetric service, liability issues, high turnover, and no previous case of rubella in an employee. Three hospitals (all screening) reported they had had a case of rubella in an employee. The data suggest slow partial compliance with recommendations for rubella screening in hospitals.

(JAMA 1983;249:2675-2678)



Author Affiliations

From the Field Services Division, Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta (Dr Sacks); the Immunization Section, Division of Disease Control, Arizona Department of Health (Ms Olson); and the Arizona Hospital Association, Phoenix (Mss Soter and Clark). Dr Sacks is currently the Acting State Epidemiologist, Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Tallahassee.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, PDHEC, 1317 Winewood Blvd, Tallahassee, FL 32301 (Dr Sacks).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Birth and Death of Congenital Rubella Syndrome
Plotkin
JAMA 1984;251:2003-2004.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.