You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 249 No. 2, January 14, 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Polytetrafluoroethylene graft survival in hemodialysis

R. Munda, M. R. First, J. W. Alexander, C. C. Linnemann Jr, J. P. Fidler and D. Kittur

Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft fistulas are widely used as secondary vascular access for patients receiving long-term hemodialysis treatment. Sixty-seven grafts were implanted in 48 patients and followed for 12 to 51 months. Cumulative patency for all grafts at 12 months was 67% +/- 6%, at 24 months 50% +/- 7%, and at 48 months 43% +/- 9%. Graft survival rates were different when considering graft configuration and location. Forearm straight graft survival at 12 months was 35% +/- 13%, upper arm curved grafts 60% +/- 19%, and forearm looped grafts 78% +/- 7%. Complications that decreased graft survival were related to thrombosis (21%), infection (25%), and intimal hyperplasia at the venous anastomosis (34%). After reviewing our experience, we believe that the challenge of secondary vascular access has not been solved by PTFE grafts. This should stimulate the search for better grafts and techniques.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical Course Associated with Vascular Access Type in a National Cohort of Adolescents Who Receive Hemodialysis: Findings from the Clinical Performance Measures and US Renal Data System Projects
Fadrowski et al.
CJASN 2006;1:987-992.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Upper Arm Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts for Dialysis Access. Analysis of Two Different Graft Sizes: 6 mm and 6-8 mm
Garcia-Pajares et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2003;37:335-343.
ABSTRACT  

Low-Intensity Warfarin Is Ineffective for the Prevention of PTFE Graft Failure in Patients on Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Crowther et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002;13:2331-2337.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Polymeric Sealant Inhibits Anastomotic Suture Hole Bleeding More Rapidly Than Gelfoam/Thrombin: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Glickman et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:326-331.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Delayed Superficialization of Brachiobasilic Fistula: Technique and Initial Experience
Zielinski et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:929-932.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of Hand Ischemia in Patients with Hemodialysis Access by Distal Arterial Ligation and Revascularization
Lin et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1999;33:481-488.
ABSTRACT  

Primary Vascular Access for Chronic Hemodialysis: A Comparison of Arteriovenous Fistulae with PTFE Grafts
Turnbull et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1999;33:51-57.
ABSTRACT  

A Preliminary Experience with the Human Homologous Vein Graft for Vascular Access
Gecim et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1996;30:395-398.
ABSTRACT  

State-of-the-Art Review : Treatment of Hemodialysis Access Failure: A Role for Thrombolysis
Sands and Miranda
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOST 1996;2:164-168.
ABSTRACT  

Intraoperative Stent Implantation for Venous Anastomotic Stenoses of Hemodialysis Grafts
Mickley et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1996;30:323-330.
ABSTRACT  

Duplex Scanning of Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Dialysis Shunts: Impact on Patient Management and Graft Survival
Mayer et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1993;27:647-658.
ABSTRACT  

Upper Arm Arteriovenous Bridge Grafts for Hemodialysis
Berman et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1992;26:85-92.
ABSTRACT  

Intravenous Lidocaine Regional Anesthesia for Forearm Arteriovenous Shunts
Geren Nichols et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1986;20:74-78.
ABSTRACT  

Complications of Renal Dialysis Access Procedures
Connolly et al.
Arch Surg 1984;119:1325-1328.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.