You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 250 No. 9, September 2, 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Failure to diagnose acute myocardial infarction. The clinicopathologic experience at a large community hospital

E. J. Zarling, H. Sexton and P. Milnor Jr

A retrospective study of 100 consecutive cases of autopsy-proved acute myocardial infarction has disclosed a surprisingly low frequency (53%) of correct antemortem diagnoses. Incorrect diagnoses seemed to be caused by (1) unjustified dependence on misleading laboratory studies, (2) inattention to suggestive or diagnostic laboratory studies, (3) atypical or obscure presentation of myocardial infarction, and (4) failure to consider acute myocardial infarction as a diagnostic possibility, particularly when the responsible physician was not a specialist in internal medicine or its subspecialty of cardiology. Suggested corrective measures are a more appropriate use of the ECG and the laboratory and education and reeducation of selected groups of physicians.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evolution of the definition of myocardial infarction: what are the implications of a new universal definition?
White
Heart 2008;94:679-684.
FULL TEXT  

Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Versus Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Score in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Chest Pain and a Nondiagnostic Electrocardiogram
Tong et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:920-927.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Safety and efficiency of emergency department assessment of chest discomfort
Christenson et al.
CMAJ 2004;170:1803-1807.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multicentre evaluation of the diagnostic value of cardiac troponin T, CK-MB mass, and myoglobin for assessing patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes in routine clinical practice
Collinson et al.
Heart 2003;89:280-286.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Angiographically Documented Occluded Infarct Vessel : Limitations of ST-Segment Elevation in Standard and Extended ECG Leads
Schmitt et al.
Chest 2001;120:1540-1546.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prospective audit of incidence of prognostically important myocardial damage in patients discharged from emergency department Commentary: Time for improved diagnosis and management of patients presenting with acute chest pain
Collinson et al.
BMJ 2000;320:1702-1705.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Missed Diagnoses of Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Emergency Room -- Continuing Challenges
Mehta and Eagle
NEJM 2000;342:1207-1210.
FULL TEXT  

Influence of Specialty on Pathology Resource Use in Evaluation of Cervical Dysplasia
SHACKELFORD et al.
Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:709-712.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Low-Tech Autopsies in the Era of High-Tech Medicine: Continued Value for Quality Assurance and Patient Safety
Lundberg
JAMA 1998;280:1273-1274.
FULL TEXT  

Editorial: Quality of Current Diagnostic Performance--Our Most Serious Health Care Quality Problem?
Williamson
American Journal of Medical Quality 1994;9:145-148.
ABSTRACT  

A Review of Atypical Clinical Manifestations of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Neill
J Intensive Care Med 1987;2:25-32.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.