You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 251 No. 2, January 13, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Effects of physical forces on the reproductive cycle. Council on Scientific Affairs


The Council on Scientific Affairs is aware that physicians, as well as the public in general, have expressed increasing concerns regarding the possible adverse effects of various physical forces on the reproductive organs. Various channels of public communication report anecdotal episodes of suspected cause-and-effect relationships between various physical elements in the environment and harmful effects on reproduction. Many of these episodes have not been substantiated by acceptable scientific research. However, some reports have appeared in the scientific literature that do document adverse reproductive effects on humans and animals at certain levels of some physical forces. At levels above 3,636 m (12,000 ft), adverse reproductive effects have been observed in men and women, in the conceptus, and in certain species of animals. Hyperthermia in excess of 40 degrees C may affect the man and the conceptus, as well as the reproductive capacity of certain animals. However, adverse effects of hypothermia have been observed only in animals. Ionizing radiation can cause injury to the man, woman, and conceptus and to animals, depending on dose and duration of exposure. There have been no well-documented injurious effects to the human reproductive organs resulting from radiofrequency-microwave radiation, but there have been some reports in animals that attributed untoward reproductive limitations to thermal effects. To date, there have been no reports in the scientific literature to implicate electronic and magnetic fields, gravity and acceleration, noise, optical radiation (UV, visible, infrared, and lasers), ultrasound, or vibration as having harmful effects on reproduction in either humans or animals. There is need for more well-designed and controlled studies to be performed in all of these areas of exposure at maximum-tolerated levels to physical force before it can be determined with certainty that no ill effects will accrue to the reproductive cycle, especially in assessing harmful effects from low-level exposure during long periods of time.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Mercury Exposure from Dental Filling Placement during Pregnancy and Low Birth Weight Risk
Hujoel et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:734-740.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.