You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 252 No. 2, July 13, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Comparison of Western European and US University Hospitals

A Case Report From Leuven, West Berlin, Leiden, London, and San Francisco

Steven A. Schroeder, MD

JAMA. 1984;252(2):240-246.


Abstract

To assess how closely US university hospitals resemble those in other Western countries, I compared four major European university hospitals— Leuven, Belgium; Klinikum Steglitz, West Berlin; Leiden, the Netherlands; and St Thomas', London—with a US institution—University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). University of California had 1.6 to 2.4 more total employees, 1.1 to 1.7 more registered nurses, 2.1 to 8.5 more staff physicians, and 1.5 to 3.0 more house officers per adjusted occupied bed. University of California's costs per bed were 2.2 to 3.5 times higher, its inclusive per diem charges at least four times higher, and its malpractice premium at least 50 times greater. Medical patients at UCSF and West Berlin were more severely ill, as judged by organ system failure, need for organ system support, and levels of consciousness. Compared with UCSF, the European hospitals had more explicit rationing of care according to age and illness severity. Overall, European university hospitals are larger, less expensive, less technology intensive, staffed by fewer employees and physicians, occupied by less severely ill patients, and more apt to serve as regional referral centers. As US university hospitals move into a price-competitive era, they may come to resemble their European counterparts.

(JAMA 1984;252:240-246)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Internal Medicine and the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Division of General Internal Medicine, 400 Parnassus Ave, A-405, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143 (Dr Schroeder).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Intensity, Not Prices
Schroeder
Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;22:264-264.
FULL TEXT  

Who Decides? Physicians' Willingness to Use Life-Sustaining Treatment
Hanson et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:785-789.
ABSTRACT  

The Residency-Practice Training Mismatch: A Primary Care Education Dilemma
Reuben et al.
Arch Intern Med 1988;148:914-919.
ABSTRACT  

Residency Training in Internal Medicine: Time for a Change?
SCHROEDER et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1986;104:554-561.
ABSTRACT  

The Physician, Rationing, and Medical Care in the Veterans Administration
CHARLES
ANN INTERN MED 1985;102:850-851.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.