You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 253 No. 13, April 5, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  COUNCIL REPORT
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Scientific Status of Refreshing Recollection by the Use of Hypnosis

Council on Scientific Affairs

JAMA. 1985;253(13):1918-1923.


Abstract

The Council finds that recollections obtained during hypnosis can involve confabulations and pseudomemories and not only fail to be more accurate, but actually appear to be less reliable than nonhypnotic recall. The use of hypnosis with witnesses and victims may have serious consequences for the legal process when testimony is based on material that is elicited from a witness who has been hypnotized for the purposes of refreshing recollection.

(JAMA 1985;253:1918-1923)



Author Affiliations

From the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, Chicago.


Footnotes

Resolution 5 (A-82), adopted unanimously by the House of Delegates on Dec 5, 1984, and referred by the Board of Trustees to the Council on Scientific Affairs, called upon the American Medical Association to "study the subject of refreshing recollection by the use of hypnosis of witnesses and victims of crime, and prepare a report on the present scientific status of this matter."

This report is not intended to be construed or to serve as a standard of medical care. Standards of medical care are determined on the basis of all of the facts and circumstances involved in an individual case and are subject to change as scientific knowledge and technology advance and patterns of practice evolve. This report reflects the views of scientific experts and reports in the scientific literature as of December 1984.

Reprint requests to Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, 535 N Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60610 (John C. Ballin, PhD).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Discovering New Memories in Psychotherapy -- Childhood Revisited, Fantasy, or Both?
Frankel
NEJM 1995;333:591-594.
FULL TEXT  

The Debate about Delayed Memories of Child Sexual Abuse: A Feminist Perspective
Enns et al.
The Counseling Psychologist 1995;23:181-279.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.