You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 253 No. 15, April 19, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (83)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Physicians' Abilities to Detect Lumps in Silicone Breast Models

Suzanne W. Fletcher, MD; Michael S. O'Malley, MSPH; Leslie A. Bunce

JAMA. 1985;253(15):2224-2228.


Abstract

Little is known about how well physicians detect breast lumps in clinical breast examinations. We studied 80 general medicine, family medicine, general surgery, and obstetrics/gynecology physicians to determine their abilities to detect lumps in manufactured breast models. The mean number of lumps detected was 8.0 (44%), with a range of three (17%) to 15 (83%). Detection varied significantly by size (87% of 1.0-cm and 14% of 0.3-cm lumps) and hardness (56% of hard and 40% of soft lumps), but not depth; by specialty (from 50% for general internists to 40% for obstetricians), but not by level of training or experience; and by search duration (r=.59). On multiple regression analysis, only search duration was consistently associated with increased detection. Modest detection rates and wide variation suggest breast lump detection can be improved among physicians. Adequate search duration may be important for high detection rates.

(JAMA 1985;253:2224-2228)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Medicine (Dr Fletcher and Mr O'Malley) and Epidemiology (Dr Fletcher), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Ms Bunce).


Footnotes

Read in part before the seventh annual meeting of the Society for Research and Education in Primary Care Internal Medicine, Washington, DC, May 4, 1984.

Reprint requests to Box 2, 5039 Old Clinic Bldg 226H, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (Dr Fletcher).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pointing the Way to Informed Medical Decision Making: Test Characteristics of Clinical Breast Examination
Barton and Elmore
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:1223-1225.
FULL TEXT  

Screening Clinical Breast Examination: How Often Does It Miss Lethal Breast Cancer?
Fenton et al.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005;2005:67-71.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Breast Cancer
Elmore et al.
JAMA 2005;293:1245-1256.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Augmented, Pulsating Tactile Feedback Facilitates Simulator Training of Clinical Breast Examinations
Gerling and Thomas
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2005;47:670-681.
ABSTRACT  

Performance and Reporting of Clinical Breast Examination: A Review of the Literature
McDonald et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54:345-361.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Routinely Teaching Breast Self-Examination is Dead. What Does This Mean?
Harris and Kinsinger
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1420-1421.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of Sociodemographic Factors, Hormone Receptor Status, and Tumor Grade on Ethnic Differences in Tumor Stage and Size for Breast Cancer in US Women
Miller et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:534-545.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does This Patient Have Breast Cancer?: The Screening Clinical Breast Examination: Should It Be Done? How?
Barton et al.
JAMA 1999;282:1270-1280.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recommendations for Follow-up Care of Individuals With an Inherited Predisposition to Cancer: II. BRCA1 and BRCA2
Burke et al.
JAMA 1997;277:997-1003.
ABSTRACT  

The Breast Is Close to the Heart
Fletcher and Fletcher
ANN INTERN MED 1992;117:969-971.
ABSTRACT  

Teaching Preventive Medicine and Health Maintenance
Fletcher and Fletcher
ANN INTERN MED 1992;116:1094-1098.
ABSTRACT  

Training Breast Self-Examination: A Research Review and Critique
Pinto and Fuqua
Health Educ Behav 1991;18:495-516.
ABSTRACT  

Accuracy of Pelvic Examination
Ferris et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1991;114:522-522.
ABSTRACT  

How Best to Teach Women Breast Self-Examination: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Fletcher et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1990;112:772-779.
ABSTRACT  

Health Education for Testicular Cancer
Friman and Finney
Health Educ Behav 1990;17:443-453.
 

Screening for Breast Cancer With Breast Self-examination: A Critical Review
O'Malley and Fletcher
JAMA 1987;257:2196-2203.
ABSTRACT  

A Word of Caution Concerning Mammography
Newsome and McLelland
JAMA 1986;255:528-528.
ABSTRACT  

Sensitivity and Specificity in Silicone Breast Models
Gump
JAMA 1985;254:2409-2409.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.