You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 253 No. 24, June 28, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Postponing or Preventing Deaths?

Trends in Infant Survival, Georgia, 1974 Through 1981

James W. Buehler, MD; Carol J. R. Hogue, PhD; Susan M. Zaro, MPH

JAMA. 1985;253(24):3564-3567.


Abstract

Trends in survival were examined for infants in five birth-weight groups (500 to 999 g, 1,000 to 1,499 g, 1,500 to 1,999 g, 2,000 to 2,499 g, and ≥2,500 g). The study population consisted of infants born in Georgia from 1974 through 1981. Survival to the first birthday increased for all birthweight groups. Improvements in postneonatal survival occurred concurrently with improvements in neonatal survival, except for infants with birth weights of 500 to 999 g. Between 1974-1975 and 1980-1981, the proportion of deaths that were attributed to perinatal conditions but occurred during the postneonatal period increased from 1.1% to 4.7%. These observations suggest that advances in perinatal care have led to postponement rather than prevention of a few infant deaths, although overall many more deaths were prevented. For infants with birth weights of less than 1,500 g, lower mortality among those admitted to newborn intensive care units was the major contributor to improved survival. Our findings indicate that both neonatal and postneonatal mortality should be examined in evaluating the effects of perinatal care.

(JAMA 1985;253:3564-3567)



Author Affiliations

From the Pregnancy Epidemiology Branch, Division of Reproductive Health, Center for Health Promotion and Education, Centers for Disease Control (Drs Buehler and Hogue), and the Office of Epidemiology, Georgia Department of Human Resources (Ms Zaro), Atlanta.


Footnotes

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Changes in mortality and morbidities among infants born at less than 25 weeks during the post-surfactant era
Hintz et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F128-F133.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Delivery Room Resuscitation Decisions for Extremely Premature Infants
Doron et al.
Pediatrics 1998;102:574-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Status at Discharge and Cause of Death for Postneonatal Infant Deaths: A Total Population Study
Kempe et al.
Pediatrics 1997;99:338-344.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Postponing or Preventing Death? Trends in Infant Survival
Dujardin et al.
JAMA 1986;256:1140-1140.
ABSTRACT  

Postponing or Preventing Deaths? Trends in Infant Survival
Sepkowitz
JAMA 1985;254:2736-2737.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.