You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 253 No. 7, February 15, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cytologic Manifestations of Cervical and Vaginal Infections

II. Confirmation of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection by Direct Immunofluorescence Using Monoclonal Antibodies

Nancy B. Kiviat, MD; Marcia Peterson, CT(ASCP); Elaine Kinney-Thomas, PhD; Milton Tam, PhD; Walter E. Stamm, MD; King K. Holmes, MD, PhD

JAMA. 1985;253(7):997-1000.


Abstract

We found inflammatory patterns of transparent lymphocytes on increased numbers of histiocytes suggestive of chlamydial infection in 68 (56%) of 121 cervical cytologic smears. Chlamydia trachomatis was isolated from 36 (53%) of those with and only two (4%) of those without such inflammatory patterns. Direct stain with fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies demonstrated elementary bodies of C trachomatis in 30 (79%) of the 38 culture-positive patients, including 29 of the culture-positive patients who had an inflammatory cytologic pattern suggestive of C trachomatis infection. Thus, Papanicolaou smears can be screened for inflammatory pattern, and separate endocervical smears from patients with a pattern suggestive of chlamydial infection can then be stained by immunofluorescence to confirm the presence of C trachomatis infection. This two-step approach detected 29 of 38 infections confirmed by culture in the present study, giving a sensitivity of 76%, a specificity of 100%, and a positive predictive value of 100% in a population having a 31% prevalence of C trachomatis infection.

(JAMA 1985;253:997-1000)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Kiviat and Ms Peterson) and Medicine (Drs Stamm and Holmes), University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, and Genetic Systems Corporation (Drs Kinney-Thomas and Tam), Seattle.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Harborview Medical Center ZA-51, 325 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98104 (Dr Kiviat).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Genitourinary Infections
STAMM
ANN INTERN MED 1988;108:710-717.
ABSTRACT  

Cytologic Manifestations of Cervical and Vaginal Infections: I. Epithelial and Inflammatory Cellular Changes
Kiviat et al.
JAMA 1985;253:989-996.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.