You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 254 No. 1, July 5, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  BRIEF REPORT
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Experience With a Cost-effective Crossmatch Protocol

Ira A. Shulman, MD; Janice M. Nelson, MD; Donald R. Kent, MT(ASCP); Virginia L. Jacobs, MT(ASCP); Roland K. Nakayama, MT(ASCP); Sharon A. Malone, MD

JAMA. 1985;254(1):93-95.


Abstract

Pretransfusion blood samples were routinely tested for ABO group, Rh type, and the presence of unexpected red blood cell antibodies. Patients who had unexpected red blood cell antibodies received transfusions of blood that was crossmatched using an immediate spin test, a 37 {dagger}C incubation step, and an indirect antiglobulin test. Patients who did not have unexpected red blood cell antibodies received transfusions with blood that was crossmatched by an immediate spin crossmatch only. Because the average immediate spin crossmatch required only 3.25 minutes to be performed, crossmatches were not done for patients without unexpected antibodies until blood was actually requested to be issued for transfusion. During the first 8 1/2 months this protocol was used, 27,742 crossmatches were performed and 46,959 unnecessary crossmatches were avoided, thus reducing direct costs by at least $49,300. This protocol also allowed for optimal blood inventory control and minimized the outdating of units of blood to only 0.19%.

(JAMA 1985;254:93-95)



Author Affiliations

From the Blood Bank, Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the Blood Bank, Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center, PO Box 771, 1200 N State St, Los Angeles, CA 90033 (Dr Shulman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reducing the Costs of Screening Blood for Unexpected Antibodies
Issitt
JAMA 1985;254:3423-3424.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.