You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 254 No. 11, September 20, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  SPECIAL COMMUNICATION
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Screening in Health Fairs

A Critical Review of Benefits, Risks, and Costs

Donald M. Berwick, MD

JAMA. 1985;254(11):1492-1498.


Abstract

Health fairs provide multiphasic screening to more than 2 million Americans each year, and the number is growing rapidly. Nearly 40 different tests are in use, commonly including the measurement of up to 30 different blood chemistry levels. This report reviews the activities in a sample of 940 health fair sites and examines the experience regarding six specific screening procedures (blood pressure, anemia, blood chemistries, glaucoma, hearing, and fecal occult blood testing). Widespread use of these and other tests raises complex issues of cost, risk, and benefit. Rates of false alarm of healthy people and false reassurance of those at risk may be high for some tests, and the benefits of detecting new disease are easily overestimated. Detailed data collection and evaluation could help health fair sponsors to identify more rational screening strategies.

(JAMA 1985;254:1492-1498)



Author Affiliations

From the Institute for Health Research, Harvard Community Health Plan, Boston.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the Institute for Health Research, Harvard Community Health Plan, 1 Fenway Plaza, Boston, MA 02215 (Dr Berwick).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Osteopathic Medicine and Community Health Fairs: Increasing Public Awareness While Improving Public Health
Stamat et al.
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 2008;108:397-403.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening, Education, and Associated Behavioral Responses to Reduce Risk for Falls Among People Over Age 65 Years Attending a Community Health Fair
Ness et al.
ptjournal 2003;83:631-637.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Experimental Evaluation of an Incentive Program to Reduce Serum Cholesterol Levels Among Health Fair Participants
Francisco et al.
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:246-251.
ABSTRACT  

Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analyses in the Medical Literature: Are the Methods Being Used Correctly?
Udvarhelyi et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1992;116:238-244.
ABSTRACT  

Impact of a Public Cholesterol Screening Program
Fischer et al.
Arch Intern Med 1990;150:2567-2572.
ABSTRACT  

Labeling of Participants in High Blood Pressure Screening Programs: Implications for Blood Cholesterol Screenings
Lefebvre et al.
Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1993-1997.
ABSTRACT  

Screening and Health Fairs
Perry
JAMA 1986;255:2443-2443.
ABSTRACT  

Screening for Melanoma and Skin Cancer
Arundell
JAMA 1986;255:2443-2444.
ABSTRACT  

What Is "Appropriate" Utilization of Diagnostic Tests?: Technical Performance, Diagnostic Performance, and Clinical Utility
Krieg et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 1986;1:70-78.
 

Multiphasic Screening: Panacea or Diagnostic Nightmare?
Ring
JAMA 1985;254:1499-1499.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.