You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 254 No. 19, November 15, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Curriculum Change in the 1980s

A Report of 40 Southern US Medical Schools

Terrence T. Kuske, MD; Glenn A. Fleming, EdD; Roy K. Jarecky, EdD; Jon H. Levine, MD; Lloyd A. Lewis, PhD

JAMA. 1985;254(19):2783-2786.


Abstract

Forty southern medical schools were surveyed to evaluate the nature and mechanisms of curricular change during 1980 to 1983. Ninety percent of schools experienced change in some aspect of curriculum. Faculty, curriculum committees, the dean, and external forces were stimuli for change. Internal self-review or self-criticism seemed to be the most important reasons for change. Proposals were considered by curriculum committees and the dean, but veto power often rested with the dean, although departmental chairmen and faculty occasionally had veto power. Types of change were divided equally between content, timing of courses, and the educational process. Half the schools stated that they had evaluated the changes or planned to do so. Thirteen of 38 changes in curriculum were in the direction of curricular innovations of the 1960s and 1970s and 25 were in the opposite direction.

(JAMA 1985;254:2783-2786)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine (Dr Kuske) and Division of Educational Research (Dr Lewis), Medical College of Georgia, Augusta; the Department of Medicine (Dr Levine) and Office of Educational Service (Dr Fleming), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and the Office of Education, School of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Jarecky).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Associate Dean for Curriculum, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912 (Dr Kuske).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Does Faculty Development Enhance Teaching Effectiveness?
Hendricson et al.
J Dent Educ 2007;71:1513-1533.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Dental Curriculum at North American Dental Institutions in 2002-03: A Survey of Current Structure, Recent Innovations, and Planned Changes
Kassebaum et al.
J Dent Educ 2004;68:914-931.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.