You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 254 No. 23, December 20, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  COUNCIL REPORT
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Xenografts

Review of the Literature and Current Status

Council on Scientific Affairs

JAMA. 1985;254(23):3353-3357.


Abstract

In response to growing public and legislative interest in organ transplantation, the American Medical Association's Council on Scientific Affairs has convened an advisory panel to prepare state-of-the-art monographs on several of the central topics. The first report of the panel, approved by the Council in February 1985, reviews the experimental work with xenografts. This report summarizes the published experience with animal and human xenografts to date and discusses the mechanisms of xenograft rejection. The report concludes that the process of xenograft rejection qualitatively resembles allograft rejection, involving both cellular and humoral immune mechanisms, but differs quantitatively depending on the genetic disparity between donor and recipient. Relative beneficial effects of various immunosuppression regimens, including cyclosporin on xenograft survival in donor recipient models with varying genetic disparity, have not yet been studied in a critical fashion.

(JAMA 1985;254:3353-3357)



Author Affiliations

From the Council on Scientific Affairs, Division of Evaluation and Nomenclature, American Medical Association, Chicago.


Footnotes

This report is not intended to be construed or to serve as a standard of medical care. Standards of medical care are determined on the basis of all of the facts and circumstances involved in an individual case and are subject to change as scientific knowledge and technology advance and patterns of practice evolve. This report reflects the views of scientific literature as of June 1985.

Reprint requests to Division of Evaluation and Nomenclature, Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, 535 N Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60610 (John C. Ballin, PhD).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Informed Consent and Baby Fae
Knoll and Lundberg
JAMA 1985;254:3359-3360.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.