You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 254 No. 5, August 2, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  SPECIAL COMMUNICATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Medical Profession and Nuclear War

A Social History

Barbara Day, MA; Howard Waitzkin, MD, PhD

JAMA. 1985;254(5):644-651.


Abstract

Since World War II, individual physicians and medical organizations in the United States have cooperated with the federal government in preparing for nuclear war. While most physicians have maintained a neutral stance, a minority have resisted federal policies. Health professionals participated actively at the wartime laboratories that developed the atomic bomb and in the medical research that followed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Professional organizations helped with civil defense planning for nuclear conflict during the Cold War of the late 1950s and early 1960s. Medical resistance to nuclear war began in the same period, gained wide attention with the growth of Physicians for Social Responsibility in the early 1960s, declined during the Vietnam War, and vastly increased in the early 1980s. Activism by health professionals usually has responded to government policies that have increased the perceived risk of nuclear conflict. The recent return of civil defense planning has stimulated opposition in medical circles. Ambiguities of medical professionalism limit the scope of activism in the nuclear arena. These ambiguities concern the interplay of organized medicine and government, tensions between science and politics, and the difficulties of day-to-day work in medicine while the arms race continues.

(JAMA 1985;254:644-651)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of History (Ms Day) and Medicine (Dr Waitzkin), and the School of Social Sciences (Dr Waitzkin), University of California, Irvine.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to North Orange County Community Clinic, 300 West Romneya Dr, Anaheim, CA 92801 (Dr Waitzkin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: Opportunities for Control and Abolition
Sidel and Levy
AJPH 2007;97:1589-1594.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dispelling the Specter of Nuclear Holocaust
Fee and Brown
AJPH 2004;94:36-36.
FULL TEXT  

Medicine and Nuclear War: From Hiroshima to Mutual Assured Destruction to Abolition 2000
Forrow and Sidel
JAMA 1998;280:456-461.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The "Gag Rule" Revisited: Physicians as Abortion Gatekeepers
Bloche
J Law Med Ethics 1992;20:392-402.
 

The Medical Response to Nuclear War
Alexander
JAMA 1985;254:3032-3032.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.