You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 254 No. 8, August 23, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Breast cancer prediction and the Wolfe classification of mammograms

T. Carlile, K. J. Kopecky, D. J. Thompson, J. R. Whitehead, F. I. Gilbert Jr, A. J. Present, B. A. Threatt, P. Krook and E. Hadaway

Mammographic parenchymal patterns have been proposed as a method of determining women at high risk of developing breast cancer. Wolfe's original report of relative risks as high as 37:1 for "dysplastic" breasts (DY) as compared with adipose breasts (N1), with intermediate values of P1 and P2, were not uniformly confirmed by others. (Relative risks are used here as the equivalent of odds ratios.) A case-control study of 706 breast cancers, each with two matching controls, drawn from 40,000 participants in four Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project clinics, was conducted to assess the role of the Wolfe classification of breast parenchymal patterns as a breast-cancer risk factor together with a set of well-established risk factors for breast cancer. Relative risks of 3.1 for DY to N1, 3.5 for P2 to N1, and 2.0 for P1 to N1 were determined. These are comparable to or greater than other known risk factors found in the same population. The Wolfe classification of parenchymal patterns strengthens the basis for clinical judgment, but should not be used exclusively to determine intervention in an individual patient's care.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Recreational Physical Activity and Mammographic Breast Density Characteristics
Reeves et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:934-942.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis.
McCormack and dos Santos Silva
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1159-1169.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Wolfe's Parenchymal Pattern and Percentage of the Breast with Mammographic Densities: Redundant or Complementary Classifications?
Brisson et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:728-732.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk of Subsequent Breast Cancer in Relation to Characteristics of Screening Mammograms from Women Less Than 50 Years of Age
Thomas et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:565-571.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.