This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Patricia H. Shiono, PhD; Mark A. Klebanoff, MD, MPH; Barry I. Graubard, MA; Heinz W. Berendes, MD, MHS; George G. Rhoads, MD, MPH

JAMA. 1986;255(1):48-52.

Abstract
Differences in mean birth weight and low birth weight (<2.5 kg) are analyzed among Asians, blacks, Hispanics, and whites who were enrolled in the Northern California Kaiser-Permanente Birth Defects Study, a prospective study of 29,415 pregnancy outcomes. Large differences in birth weight among babies of different ethnic groups persist after controlling for the joint effects of maternal smoking and alcohol use during pregnancy, sex of child, parity, length of prenatal care, and maternal weight-for-height percentile. Compared with whites, the relative mean differences in birth weight are estimated as —246 g for blacks, —210 g for Asians, —105 g for Hispanics, and —140 g for others. The low-birth-weight rates and crude odds ratios are 7.70% (2.17) for blacks; 5.57% (1.57) for Asians; 5.52% (1.55) for others; 4.00% (1.13) for Hispanics; and 3.55% (1.00) for whites. After controlling for the effects of 22 factors, the odds ratios for a low-birth-weight infant are 2.41 for blacks, 1.37 for Asians, 1.93 for others, and 1.25 for Hispanics. It is concluded that factors currently used to control for ethnic differences in birth weight are insufficient to explain the observed differences.

(JAMA 1986;255:48-52)

Author Affiliations
From the Epidemiology and Biometry Research Program, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to the Epidemiology and Biometry Research Program, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Landow Bldg 8B06, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Dr Shiono).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Differences in Neonatal Mortality Among Whites and Asian American Subgroups: Evidence From California
Baker et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:69-76.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of a Reduced-Visit Prenatal Care Clinical Practice Guideline
Partridge and Holman
J Am Board Fam Med 2005;18:555-560.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychosocial Factors and Preterm Birth Among African American and White Women in Central North Carolina
Dole et al.
AJPH 2004;94:1358-1365.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perinatal Outcomes in Two Dissimilar Immigrant Populations in the United States: A Dual Epidemiologic Paradox
Gould et al.
Pediatrics 2003;111:e676-682.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Birth Characteristics and Leukemia in Young Children
Reynolds et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:603-613.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prenatal Care Use Among Selected Asian American Groups
Yu et al.
AJPH 2001;91:1865-1868.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Why Do Mexican Americans Give Birth to Few Low-Birth-Weight Infants?
Buekens et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:347-351.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Newborn Discharge Timing and Readmissions: California, 1992-1995
Danielsen et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:31-39.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mexican American Women's Expressions of the Meaning of Culturally Congruent Prenatal Care
Berry
J Transcult Nurs 1999;10:203-212.
ABSTRACT  

Testing the Epidemiologic Paradox of Low Birth Weight in Latinos
Fuentes-Afflick et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:147-153.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Low Birth Weight: Race and Maternal Nativity--- Impact of Community Income
Fang et al.
Pediatrics 1999;103:e5-5.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Growth of Infants and Young Children Born Small or Large for Gestational Age: Findings From the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Hediger et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:1225-1231.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Association Between Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization and Subsequent Pediatric Care Utilization in the United States
Kogan et al.
Pediatrics 1998;102:25-30.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Changing Pattern of Prenatal Care Utilization in the United States, 1981-1995, Using Different Prenatal Care Indices
Kogan et al.
JAMA 1998;279:1623-1628.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Low Birth Weight and Latino Ethnicity: Examining the Epidemiologic Paradox
Fuentes-Afflick and Lurie
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997;151:665-674.
ABSTRACT  

Effect of Frequency of Prenatal Care Visits on Perinatal Outcome Among Low-Risk Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
McDuffie et al.
JAMA 1996;275:847-851.
ABSTRACT  

The Influence of Infant and Maternal Sickle Cell Disease on Birth Outcome and Neonatal Course
Brown et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994;148:1156-1162.
ABSTRACT  

Relation of the Content of Prenatal Care to the Risk of Low Birth Weight: Maternal Reports of Health Behavior Advice and Initial Prenatal Care Procedures
Kogan et al.
JAMA 1994;271:1340-1345.
ABSTRACT  

Trends in Teenage Smoking During Pregnancy: Washington State: 1984 Through 1988
Davis et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1990;144:1297-1301.
ABSTRACT  

The Effect of Social Support on Prenatal Care
John and Winston
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 1989;25:79-98.
ABSTRACT  

Half Empty, Half Full: What We Know About Low Birth Weight Among Blacks
Baldwin
JAMA 1986;255:86-88.
ABSTRACT