You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 255 No. 10, March 14, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  SPECIAL COMMUNICATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Popular Press Coverage of Eight National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Topics

John D. Winkler, PhD; David E. Kanouse, PhD; Laurel Brodsley, RN, PhD, MPH; Robert H. Brook, MD, ScD

JAMA. 1986;255(10):1323-1327.


Abstract

The quality of medical journalism has been widely criticized. As part of a larger evaluation study, we analyzed popular press coverage of eight topics selected by the National Institutes of Health for consensus development conferences in 1979 and 1980. Using periodical indexes to identify relevant articles, we analyzed the characteristics of 269 topical articles published in newspapers and magazines in the four years surrounding each conference and examined the role that the conference played in subsequent reporting. Most topics received widespread press interest that culminated around the time of each conference. Consensus findings were widely cited in articles that appeared after the conferences. Articles were mostly factual and balanced, relied on experts, and emphasized major themes covered by the conference. We conclude that the popular press can make an important contribution to the dissemination of new medical information.

(JAMA 1986;255:1323-1327)



Author Affiliations

From The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif (Drs Winkler, Kanouse, Brodsley, and Brook); and the Center for Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles (Dr Brook).


Footnotes

The views expressed in this article are the authors' own and are not necessarily shared by The Rand Corporation or the National Institutes of Health.

Reprint requests to The Rand Corporation, 1700 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90406 (Dr Winkler).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Work Setting, Publication, and Scientific Responsibility
Rier
Science Communication 2003;24:420-457.
ABSTRACT  

Change in the Use of Breast-Conserving Surgery in Western Washington After the 1990 NIH Consensus Development Conference
Lazovich et al.
Arch Surg 1997;132:418-423.
ABSTRACT  

Change in Cholesterol Awareness and Action: Results From National Physician and Public Surveys
Schucker et al.
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:666-673.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluating Understanding of Popular Press Reports of Health Research
Yeaton et al.
Health Educ Behav 1990;17:223-234.
ABSTRACT  

Consensus Conferences
Riesenberg
JAMA 1987;258:2738-2738.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.