You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 255 No. 20, May 23, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (86)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evaluating Individual Hospital Quality Through Outcome Statistics

Harold S. Luft, PhD; Sandra S. Hunt, MPA

JAMA. 1986;255(20):2780-2784.


Abstract

Case abstract data are routinely collected by hospital abstracting services, peer review organizations, and some state agencies. These data have proved invaluable in the analysis of patterns of performance across large numbers of hospitals and have shown, for example, the inverse relation between diagnosis- or procedure-specific volume and outcome. Routinely collected data also appear to be an attractive means for identifying hospitals, and perhaps physicians, with particularly good or poor outcomes for their patients. Unfortunately, problems of small numbers of patients and relatively low rates of poor outcomes make it difficult to be confident in the identification of individual performers. Recent data for cardiac catheterization patients are used to illustrate this problem.

(JAMA 1986;255:2780-2784)



Author Affiliations

From the Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Institute of Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, 1326 Third Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 (Dr Luft).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Standards for Statistical Models Used for Public Reporting of Health Outcomes: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Writing Group: Cosponsored by the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention and the Stroke Council Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Krumholz et al.
Circulation 2006;113:456-462.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The volume-outcome relationship: from Luft to Leapfrog
Shahian and Normand
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003;75:1048-1058.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Better for whom? Policy implications of acting on the relation between volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass grafting
Luft
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1931-1933.
FULL TEXT  

Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data
Jarman et al.
BMJ 1999;318:1515-1520.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Public Performance Reports: A Survey of Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
Schneider and Epstein
JAMA 1998;279:1638-1642.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Healthcare outcomes management and quality improvement
Al-Assaf
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 1996;116:245-252.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluation of the Complication Rate as a Measure of Quality of Care in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Silber et al.
JAMA 1995;274:317-323.
ABSTRACT  

Quality Assurance Issues Raised by Proposed Limited-Service Rural Hospitals
Wingert et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 1991;6:38-46.
ABSTRACT  

Does Quality Influence Choice of Hospital?
Luft et al.
JAMA 1990;263:2899-2906.
ABSTRACT  

Identification of Adverse Events Occurring during Hospitalization: A Cross-Sectional Study of Litigation, Quality Assurance, and Medical Records at Two Teaching Hospitals
Brennan et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1990;112:221-226.
ABSTRACT  

The Importance of Severity of Illness in Assessing Hospital Mortality
Green et al.
JAMA 1990;263:241-246.
ABSTRACT  

Surgeon Volume vs Hospital Volume: Which Matters More?
Garnick et al.
JAMA 1989;262:547-548.
ABSTRACT  

Potential Effectiveness of Comparative Casemis-corrected Adverse Outcome Rates as Quality Monitors in a Simulated Hospital System
Pine et al.
Med Decis Making 1989;9:104-115.
ABSTRACT  

Is There a Rationale for Regionalizing Organ Transplantation Services?
Sloan et al.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1989;14:115-167.
ABSTRACT  

Assessing Quality
Kelly
JAMA 1988;260:2715-2716.
ABSTRACT  

Labor Union Involvement in Occupational Safety and Health, 1957 1987
Robinson
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1988;13:453-468.
ABSTRACT  

Privilege Delineation in a Demanding New Environment
ROBERTS et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1988;108:880-886.
ABSTRACT  

Uses of the Peer Review Organization Medicare Database
Kelly et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 1988;3:53-56.
ABSTRACT  

Selective Contracting for Hospital Care Based on Volume, Quality, and Price: Prospects, Problems, and Unanswered Questions
Freeland et al.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1987;12:409-426.
ABSTRACT  

Use of Claims Data Systems to Evaluate Health Care Outcomes: Mortality and Reoperation Following Prostatectomy
Wennberg et al.
JAMA 1987;257:933-936.
ABSTRACT  

Association of Volume With Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Scheduled vs Nonscheduled Operations
Showstack et al.
JAMA 1987;257:785-789.
ABSTRACT  

The Evaluation of Hospital Death Rates
Moses
JAMA 1986;255:2801-2801.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.