You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 255 No. 3, January 17, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  TOWARD OPTIMAL LABORATORY USE
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (32)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Regulation of Physicians' Office Laboratories

The Idaho Experience

Robert Crawley, MT(ASCP); Richard Belsey, MD; Darrell Brock, DrPH; Daniel M. Baer, MD

JAMA. 1986;255(3):374-382.


Abstract

Timely availability of reliable test results enhances the office practitioner's ability to provide high-quality care that is personally satisfying to patients. Modern technology allows physicians to have such timely information available through test analyses performed in an office laboratory. Studies of physicians' office laboratories in Idaho found the performance, initially, to be unacceptably variable for many hematology, urinalysis, clinical chemistry, and microbiology tests. State regulation, requiring each office laboratory to comply with quality assurance guidelines and to participate in a proficiency testing program, resulted in a marked improvement in the proficiency level of office laboratory testing in Idaho. With the increasing dispersion of clinical laboratory technology, it is essential that standards of practice for the office laboratory be developed that ensure, within reasonable limits, the reliability of test information used in patient care. If widespread acceptance of such standards cannot be developed with a voluntary approach, states should consider regulation of office laboratories within their jurisdiction. Compliance with standards of practice, voluntarily or as a result of regulation, should promote quality performance in the office laboratory and allow the physician to use confidently the timely test information in dealing with diagnostic and management problems in patient care.

(JAMA 1986;255:374-382)



Author Affiliations

From the Bureau of Laboratories, Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Boise (Mr Crawley and Dr Brock); the Department of Clinical Pathology, The Oregon Health Sciences University (Dr Belsey), and Laboratory Services, Veterans Administration Medical Center (Dr Baer), Portland, Ore.


Footnotes

Deceased.

Reprint requests to Department of Clinical Pathology, The Oregon Health Sciences University, Mail Code L471, Portland, OR 97201 (Dr Belsey).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Laboratory testing under managed care dominance in the USA
Takemura and Beck
J. Clin. Pathol. 2001;54:89-95.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Common Diagnostic Test Panels for Clinical Evaluation of New Primary Care Outpatients in Japan: A Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Takemura et al.
Clin. Chem. 1999;45:1752-1761.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Physicians' Office Laboratory: 1988 and 1996 Survey of Illinois Pediatricians
Binns et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:585-592.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Variation in Proficiency Testing Performance by Testing Site
Stull et al.
JAMA 1998;279:463-467.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is It Time to Turn the Page on CLIA 1988?
Bachner
JAMA 1998;279:473-475.
FULL TEXT  

Interrater Agreement in the Interpretation of Microscopic Urinalysis
Hueston et al.
Arch Fam Med 1995;4:547-549.
ABSTRACT  

Effect of CLIA 88 on Minnesota Physicians' Office Laboratories
Cembrowski et al.
JAMA 1995;273:524-524.
ABSTRACT  

Pediatricians' Diagnostic Approach to Pharyngitis and Impact of CLIA 1988 on Office Diagnostic Tests
Schwartz et al.
JAMA 1994;271:234-238.
ABSTRACT  

Searching for Inaccuracy in Clinical Laboratory Testing Using Medicare Data: Evidence for Prothrombin Time
Mennemeyer and Winkelman
JAMA 1993;269:1030-1033.
ABSTRACT  

Decentralized Clinical Chemistry Testing: Quality of Results Obtained by Residents and Interns in an Acute Care Setting
Nanji et al.
J Intensive Care Med 1988;3:272-277.
ABSTRACT  

Longitudinal Study of Error Prevalence in Pennsylvania Physicians' Office Laboratories
Bloch et al.
JAMA 1988;260:230-235.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluation of a Laboratory System Intended for Use in Physicians' Offices: II. Reliability of Results Produced by Health Care Workers Without Formal or Professional Laboratory Training
Belsey et al.
JAMA 1987;258:357-361.
ABSTRACT  

Managing Liability Risk in the Office Laboratory
Belsey et al.
JAMA 1986;256:1338-1341.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.