You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 255 No. 3, January 17, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Regulation of physicians' office laboratories. The Idaho experience

R. Crawley, R. Belsey, D. Brock and D. M. Baer

Timely availability of reliable test results enhances the office practitioner's ability to provide high-quality care that is personally satisfying to patients. Modern technology allows physicians to have such timely information available through test analyses performed in an office laboratory. Studies of physicians' office laboratories in Idaho found the performance, initially, to be unacceptably variable for many hematology, urinalysis, clinical chemistry, and microbiology tests. State regulation, requiring each office laboratory to comply with quality assurance guidelines and to participate in a proficiency testing program, resulted in a marked improvement in the proficiency level of office laboratory testing in Idaho. With the increasing dispersion of clinical laboratory technology, it is essential that standards of practice for the office laboratory be developed that ensure, within reasonable limits, the reliability of test information used in patient care. If widespread acceptance of such standards cannot be developed with a voluntary approach, states should consider regulation of office laboratories within their jurisdiction. Compliance with standards of practice, voluntarily or as a result of regulation, should promote quality performance in the office laboratory and allow the physician to use confidently the timely test information in dealing with diagnostic and management problems in patient care.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Laboratory testing under managed care dominance in the USA
Takemura and Beck
J. Clin. Pathol. 2001;54:89-95.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Common Diagnostic Test Panels for Clinical Evaluation of New Primary Care Outpatients in Japan: A Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Takemura et al.
Clin. Chem. 1999;45:1752-1761.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Physicians' Office Laboratory: 1988 and 1996 Survey of Illinois Pediatricians
Binns et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:585-592.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Variation in Proficiency Testing Performance by Testing Site
Stull et al.
JAMA 1998;279:463-467.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is It Time to Turn the Page on CLIA 1988?
Bachner
JAMA 1998;279:473-475.
FULL TEXT  

Decentralized Clinical Chemistry Testing: Quality of Results Obtained by Residents and Interns in an Acute Care Setting
Nanji et al.
J Intensive Care Med 1988;3:272-277.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.