You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 256 No. 14, October 10, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Brief Reports
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

How Cost Sharing Affects the Use of Ambulatory Mental Health Services

Willard G. Manning, Jr, PhD; Kenneth B. Wells, MD; Naihua Duan, PhD; Joseph P. Newhouse, PhD; John E. Ware, Jr, PhD

JAMA. 1986;256(14):1930-1934.


Abstract

The less generous insurance coverage for mental health care has generated some controversy. The major unresolved question is how the demand for outpatient mental health care responds to cost sharing. We used data from a randomized trial of fee-for-service health insurance for the nonelderly to address this question. The study enrolled 5809 persons. The results are based on 19 819 person-years of data. One hundred thirty-three percent more is spent on outpatient psychotherapy when care is free to patients than when they pay 95% of the fee, subject to an annual catastrophic limit. But, the absolute level of expenditure is low on all plans; $32 per person per year with free care. The response to psychotherapy services to cost sharing is insignificantly larger than that for outpatient general medical services. We found no evidence that more generous coverage for outpatient psychotherapy decreases total health expenditures.

(JAMA 1986;256:1930-1934)



Author Affiliations

From the Health Sciences Program, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif.


Footnotes

The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policy of The Rand Corporation or any agency of the US government.

Reprint requests to The Rand Corporation, 1700 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90406 (Dr Manning).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Effects of Copayments on Substance Abuse Treatment Expenditures and Treatment Reoccurrence
Lo Sasso and Lyons
Psychiatr. Serv. 2002;53:1605-1611.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use, Quality, and Outcomes of Care for Mental Health: The Rural Perspective
Rost et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2002;59:231-265.
ABSTRACT  

Economic Grand Rounds: The Myth of Medical Cost Offset
Sturm
Psychiatr. Serv. 2001;52:738-740.
FULL TEXT  

The Effects of Insurance Generosity on the Psychological Distress and Psychological Well-being of a General Population
Wells et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989;46:315-320.
ABSTRACT  

The Demand for Health Insurance and Health Care: A Review of the Empirical Literature
Broyles and Rosko
Med Care Res Rev 1988;45:291-338.
 

Coverage, Care, Cost, and Outcome
Borus
JAMA 1986;256:1939-1939.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.