You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 256 No. 20, November 28, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

The method of determination must be considered in interpreting blood cholesterol levels

D. W. Blank, J. M. Hoeg, M. H. Kroll and M. E. Ruddel

Based on the results of recent clinical trials, physicians have been encouraged to screen and treat patients for hypercholesterolemia. Since the data from the Lipid Research Clinics (LRC) have been used to define the patient population that should be treated, a comparison of LRC cholesterol results with those obtained with two commonly used clinical laboratory instruments was performed. Both the Technicon SMAC and the Du Pont aca had positive bias compared with the LRC method. Therefore, many patients with cholesterol concentrations greater than 265 mg/dL (6.85 mmol/L) as determined by these routinely used methods have markedly lower levels determined by LRC methods. These findings not only indicate that rigorous interlaboratory standardization is required to conform to LRC reference values, but they also suggest that the clinician should be aware of these methodological considerations when the decision to treat hypercholesterolemia is made.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.