 |
 |

An Improved System for Reporting Congenital Malformations
Stephen D. Minton, MD;
Robert E. Seegmiller, PhD
JAMA. 1986;256(21):2976-2979.
Abstract
To improve the system of reporting congenital malformations on the birth certificates of newborns, we initiated the following procedural changes at Utah Valley Regional Medical Center in 1981: (1) transference of the responsibility of reporting congenital malformations from the mother's physician to the newborn's physician; (2) development of a congenital malformation reporting sheet included in each newborn's file; and (3) appointment of a centralized single hospital medical records person to review the files and to complete the birth certificate. For 4949 births in 1982, the results of these changes were reviewed retrospectively and compared with those of a previous study at the institution. This system markedly improved the overall completeness of reporting while it identified inaccurate reporting of some malformations, incomplete reporting of multiple malformations, and the reporting of nonmalformations as congenital malformations.
(JAMA 1986;256:2976-2979)
Author Affiliations
From the Perinatal Center, Utah Valley Regional Medical Center (Dr Minton), and Department of Zoology, Brigham Young University (Dr Seegmiller), Provo, Utah.
Footnotes
Read in part before the Ninth Annual Region VIII Perinatal Conference, Keystone, Colo, May 27, 1984; Public Health Conference on Records and Statistics, Washington, DC, Aug 14, 1985; and National Environmental Public Health Conference, Denver, Feb 27, 1986,
Reprint requests to Perinatal Center, Utah Valley Regional Medical Center, 1034 N 500 W, Provo, UT 84603 (Dr Minton).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Predictive value and completeness of the registration of congenital abnormalities in three Danish population-based registries
Larsen et al.
Scand J Public Health 2003;31:12-16.
ABSTRACT
Physicians, Vital Statistics, and Disease Reporting
Goodman and Berkelman
JAMA 1987;258:379-381.
ABSTRACT
|