You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 256 No. 23, December 19, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Investigation
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Metabolic Effects of Dietary Fructose and Sucrose in Types I and II Diabetic Subjects

John P. Bantle, MD; Dawn C. Laine, RD; J. William Thomas, MS

JAMA. 1986;256(23):3241-3246.


Abstract

To learn more about the metabolic effects of dietary fructose and sucrose, 12 type I and 12 type II diabetic subjects were fed three isocaloric (or isoenergic) diets for eight days each according to a randomized, crossover design. The three diets provided, respectively, 21% of the energy as fructose, 23% of the energy as sucrose, and almost all carbohydrate energy as starch. The fructose diet resulted in significantly lower one- and two-hour postprandial plasma glucose levels, overall mean plasma glucose levels, and urinary glucose excretion in both type I and type II subjects than did the starch diet. There were no significant differences between the sucrose and starch diets in any of the measures of glycemic control in either subject group. The fructose and sucrose diets did not significantly increase serum triglyceride values when compared with the starch diet, but both increased postprandial serum lactate levels. We conclude that short-term replacement of other carbohydrate sources in the diabetic diet with fructose will improve glycemic control, whereas replacement with sucrose will not aggravate glycemic control.

(JAMA 1986;256:3241-3246)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine (Dr Bantle), General Clinical Research Center (Ms Laine), and the School of Statistics (Mr Thomas), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Box 91, Mayo Memorial Bldg, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (Dr Bantle).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Heterogeneous Effects of Fructose on Blood Lipids in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental trials in humans
Sievenpiper et al.
Diabetes Care 2009;32:1930-1937.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of daily hyperglycemia in obese type 2 diabetic men compared with that in lean and obese normoglycemic men: effect of consumption of a sucrose-containing beverage
Manders et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009;90:511-518.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dietary Fructose and Metabolic Syndrome and Diabetes
Bantle
J. Nutr. 2009;139:1263S-1268S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of 2 Liquid Nutritional Supplements for Diabetes Patients on Postprandial Glucose, Insulin Secretion, and Insulin Sensitivity in Healthy Individuals
Gonzalez-Ortiz et al.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2009;33:67-70.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Consumption of Sweetened Beverages and Intakes of Fructose and Glucose Predict Type 2 Diabetes Occurrence
Montonen et al.
J. Nutr. 2007;137:1447-1454.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fructose, glycemic load, and quantity and quality of carbohydrate in relation to plasma C-peptide concentrations in US women
Wu et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004;80:1043-1049.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dietary Carbohydrate (Amount and Type) in the Prevention and Management of Diabetes: A statement by the American Diabetes Association
Sheard et al.
Diabetes Care 2004;27:2266-2271.
FULL TEXT  

Sugar and Cardiovascular Disease: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Committee on Nutrition of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism of the American Heart Association
Howard and Wylie-Rosett
Circulation 2002;106:523-527.
FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Nutrition Principles and Recommendations for the Treatment and Prevention of Diabetes and Related Complications
Franz et al.
Diabetes Care 2002;25:148-198.
FULL TEXT  

Teaching Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes How to Incorporate Sugar Choices Into Their Daily Meal Plan Promotes Dietary Compliance and Does Not Deteriorate Metabolic Profile
Nadeau et al.
Diabetes Care 2001;24:222-227.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nutrition Update: Avoiding Sugar: Does Research Support Traditional Beliefs?
Franz
The Diabetes Educator 1993;19:144-150.
 

Effects of Various Enteral Feeding Products on Postprandial Blood Glucose Response in Patients With Type I Diabetes
Peters and Davidson
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1992;16:69-74.
ABSTRACT  

Is Exogenous Fructose Metabolism Truly Insulin Independent?
Fryburg and Gelfand
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1990;14:535-537.
ABSTRACT  

Diabetes and Carbohydrates: The Copper Connection
Hill et al.
JAMA 1987;257:2593-2593.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.