You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 256 No. 3, July 18, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (86)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Gynecological Care of Elderly Women

Another Look at Papanicolaou Smear Testing

Jeanne Mandelblatt, MD; Irene Gopaul, FNP; Marta Wistreich, MD

JAMA. 1986;256(3):367-371.


Abstract

Mortality from cervical cancer is decreasing in countries where aggressive Papanicolaou smear screening programs are in place. However, elderly women are likely to be lifelong nonusers or underusers of Papanicolaou screening, and mortality has not declined for older women. Many studies have noted that nonparticipants in Papanicolaou screening have a 2.7 to four times greater incidence of cervical cancer when they are screened compared with women who have been screened at least once. Gynecological screening was offered to 1542 elderly women in a primary care setting; 75% of the women had not had regular prior screening and 25% had never been screened. Half of these women chose to participate in our screening program. An overall prevalence rate of 13.5 per 1000 abnormal Papanicolaou smears (95% confidence interval, 5.6 to 21.4) was noted in the group. Age, race, prior screening history, and abnormal gynecological symptoms failed to predict the women who would have abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Our results suggest that cervical cancer screening should continue beyond 65 years of age if women have not received regular prior screening.

(JAMA 1986;256:367-371)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ambulatory Care, City Hospital Center at Elmhurst, Elmhurst, NY (Dr Mandelblatt); and the Departments of Nursing (Ms Gopaul), Pathology (Dr Wistreich), and Community Medicine (Dr Mandelblatt), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Department of Ambulatory Care, City Hospital Center at Elmhurst, D 1-5, 7901 Broadway, Elmhurst, NY 11373 (Dr Mandelblatt).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Balance of Harms, Benefits, and Costs of Screening for Cervical Cancer in Older Women: The Case for Continued Screening
Mandelblatt et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:245-247.
FULL TEXT  

American Cancer Society Guideline for the Early Detection of Cervical Neoplasia and Cancer
Saslow et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:342-362.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Costs and Benefits of Different Strategies to Screen for Cervical Cancer in Less-Developed Countries
Mandelblatt et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1469-1483.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Benefits and Costs of Using HPV Testing to Screen for Cervical Cancer
Mandelblatt et al.
JAMA 2002;287:2372-2381.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Make a Difference?: Lessons from Pap Smears
Hagen et al.
Med Decis Making 2001;21:307-323.
 

Continuity of Care and the Use of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Services in a Multiethnic Community
O'Malley et al.
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1462-1470.
ABSTRACT  

Effectiveness of Vaginal Papanicolaou Smear Screening After Total Hysterectomy for Benign Disease
Fetters et al.
JAMA 1996;275:940-947.
ABSTRACT  

American Women's Health Care: A Patchwork Quilt With Gaps
Clancy and Massion
JAMA 1992;268:1918-1920.
ABSTRACT  

Cost Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening for the Elderly
Fahs et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1992;117:520-527.
ABSTRACT  

Reverse Targeting of Preventive Care due to Lack of Health Insurance
Woolhandler and Himmelstein
JAMA 1988;259:2872-2874.
ABSTRACT  

Who Gets Screened for Cervical and Breast Cancer? Results From a New National Survey
Hayward et al.
Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1177-1181.
ABSTRACT  

The Cost-effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening for Low-Income Elderly Women
Mandelblatt and Fahs
JAMA 1988;259:2409-2413.
ABSTRACT  

Papanicolaou Smear Testing in Elderly Women
Kochersberger and Studenski
JAMA 1986;256:2819-2819.
ABSTRACT  

The Papanicolaou Test in Elderly Women
Riesenberg
JAMA 1986;256:393-393.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.