You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 256 No. 5, August 1, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Is Hysterectomy a Risk Factor for Vaginal Cancer?

James M. Herman, MD, MSPH; Howard D. Homesley, MD; Mark B. Dignan, PhD

JAMA. 1986;256(5):601-603.


Abstract

Several recent case series have called attention to a possible association between previous hysterectomy and the subsequent development of vaginal cancer. To study this relationship, we compared 49 patients with vaginal cancer with 49 controls matched for age, race, and prior cervical dysplasia or neoplasia. Patients and controls were alike in terms of exposure to estrogens. Twenty-four patients (49%) had had prior hysterectomies, of which 13 (27%) were for benign disease. Similarly, 24 controls had a history of a hysterectomy. The matched-pairs odds ratio relating prior hysterectomy to vaginal cancer was 1.00 based on these data, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.47 to 2.12. In the subsample of women without a history of cervical disease, a similar odds ratio appeared. Although the study sample size did not permit exclusion of a twofold increase in risk, the statistical power to detect an actual odds ratio of 2.5 is 76%. At this level of statistical power, our data suggest that hysterectomy has a low probability of being a risk factor for vaginal cancer when age and cervical disease are controlled for. In the absence of such a relationship, screening for vaginal cancer does not appear to be necessary for women who have had a hysterectomy for benign disease.

(JAMA 1986;256:601-603)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Family and Community Medicine (Drs Herman and Dignan) and Obstetrics and Gyncology (Dr Homesley), Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Department of Family and Community Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, 300 S Hawthorne Rd, Winston-Salem, NC 27103 (Dr Herman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

New and Surprising Insights Into Pathogenesis of Multicentric Squamous Cancers in the Female Lower Genital Tract
Feng and Kiviat
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1798-1799.
FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of Vaginal Papanicolaou Smear Screening After Total Hysterectomy for Benign Disease
Fetters et al.
JAMA 1996;275:940-947.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.