You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 256 No. 8, August 22, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Randomized Trial of Medical Quality Assurance

Improving Physicians' Use of Pelvimetry

Mark R. Chassin, MD, MPP, MPH; Sally M. McCue, MBA

JAMA. 1986;256(8):1012-1016.


Abstract

The capacity of educational programs to improve physician performance remains doubtful despite many evaluative efforts. This is especially true for programs sponsored by the federal government. We tested the efficacy of an educational program conducted by Professional Standards Review Organizations in reducing the inappropriate use of x-ray pelvimetry. This procedure may cause harm to the fetus, and there is little evidence that it is efficacious. We randomly assigned 120 hospitals in six Professional Standards Review Organizations to study and control groups. Physicians with delivery privileges at each study hospital participated in an educational program that discussed acceptable indications for x-ray pelvimetry. Pelvimetry use was similar in study and control hospitals before the program. However, after the program, pelvimetry was performed by physicians at study hospitals less than one third as often as by physicians at control hospitals. We conclude that educational programs can improve physician performance substantially and that such programs can be effectively conducted by federally sponsored physician organizations.

(JAMA 1986;256:1012-1016)



Author Affiliations

From the Health Program, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif (Dr Chassin), and the La Jolla Management Corporation, Rockville, Md (Ms McCue).


Footnotes

The opinions, conclusions, and proposals in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Health and Human Services, The Rand Corporation, or the La Jolla Management Corporation.

Reprint requests to The Rand Corporation, 1700 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90406-2138 (Dr Chassin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Continuing Medical Education Effect on Practice Performance: Effectiveness of Continuing Medical Education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines
Davis and Galbraith
Chest 2009;135:42S-48S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Audience Characteristics and External Factors in Continuing Medical Education and Physician Change: Effectiveness of Continuing Medical Education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines
Lowe et al.
Chest 2009;135:56S-61S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Limited Role of Expert Guidelines in Teaching Psychopharmacology
Salzman
Acad. Psychiatry 2005;29:176-179.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Ethics of Practice Guidelines
Berger and Rosner
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:2051-2056.
ABSTRACT  

Changing Physician Performance: A Systematic Review of the Effect of Continuing Medical Education Strategies
Davis et al.
JAMA 1995;274:700-705.
ABSTRACT  

Evidence for the Effectiveness of CME: A Review of 50 Randomized Controlled Trials
Davis et al.
JAMA 1992;268:1111-1117.
ABSTRACT  

Further Issues in Small Area Variations Analysis
Stano
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1991;16:573-588.
ABSTRACT  

Small Area Variations: A Critical Review of Propositions, Methods, and Evidence
Folland and Stano
Med Care Res Rev 1990;47:419-465.
 

Do objectiue Estimates of chances for Survival Influence Decisions to Withhold or Withdraw Treatment?
Knaus et al.
Med Decis Making 1990;10:163-171.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.