You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 257 No. 2, January 9, 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Inevitable Failure of Current Cost-Containment Strategies

Why They Can Provide Only Temporary Relief

William B. Schwartz, MD

JAMA. 1987;257(2):220-224.


Abstract

Current strategies for controlling hospital costs have focused primarily on eliminating care that is presumed to be of no medical value. These efforts have neglected the central fact that eliminating such care reduces current expenditures, but has little or no influence on three key factors responsible for the upward trend in real costs—population growth, rising input prices ("the hospital market basket"), and technologic innovation and diffusion. Aging of the population and the rising costs of malpractice insurance have received undue attention; together they can account for only three tenths of a percentage point in the upward trend. Gradual elimination of presumably useless care, perhaps as much as 30% of inpatient-days, can save many billions of dollars, but can only offset for a few years the forces causing costs to rise in US community hospitals. Indeed, in 1984, the reduction in patient days and resultant slowing in the real rate of rise to 2.1% appear simply to have concealed an underlying real rate of increase that was close to 7%. After all unnecessary days have been eliminated, the underlying rate of increase will reemerge unless limitations are placed on technologic innovation or beneficial services are rationed.

(JAMA 1987;257:220-224)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, and the Medical Service, New England Medical Center Hospitals, Boston.


Footnotes

The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policies of the Commonwealth Fund, New York, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ.

Reprint requests to Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111 (Dr Schwartz).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Health Care Spending Growth: How Different Is The United States From The Rest Of The OECD?
White
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:154-161.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Beyond Competition: The Normative Implications of Consumer-Driven Health Plans
Rosenthal and Daniels
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2006;31:671-685.
ABSTRACT  

Accepting Critically Ill Transfer Patients: Adverse Effect on a Referral Center's Outcome and Benchmark Measures
Rosenberg et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:882-890.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes Research in Critical Care . Results of the American Thoracic Society Critical Care Assembly Workshop on Outcomes Research
RUBENFELD et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999;160:358-367.
FULL TEXT  

Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Medicare Costs
Redberg et al.
NEJM 1999;340:813-814.
FULL TEXT  

Hitting the "Target" in Health Care Cost Control
Cohen
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1999;24:697-703.
 

Why Liberals Should Embrace Managed Care
Burton
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1999;24:911-919.
 

Managed Care, Medical Technology, and Health Care Cost Growth: A Review of the Evidence
Chernew et al.
Med Care Res Rev 1998;55:259-288.
ABSTRACT  

The Australian Health Care System: Are the Incentives Down Under Right Side Up?
Peabody et al.
JAMA 1996;276:1944-1950.
ABSTRACT  

Estimating Health Expenditure Growth Under Managed Competition: Science, Simulations, and Scenarios
Miller and Luft
JAMA 1995;273:656-662.
ABSTRACT  

The Yin and Yang of Health Care System Reform: Professional and Political Strategies for Setting Limits
Daniels and Sabin
Arch Fam Med 1995;4:67-71.
ABSTRACT  

Painful vs Painless Cost Control
Grumbach and Bodenheimer
JAMA 1994;272:1458-1464.
ABSTRACT  

Health System Reform: A Different Approach
Fuchs
JAMA 1994;272:560-563.
ABSTRACT  

New Do-Not-Resuscitate Policies
Small
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1536-1539.
ABSTRACT  

Setting Limits in Clinical Medicine
Murphy et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:505-512.
ABSTRACT  

The Economics of Dying -- The Illusion of Cost Savings at the End of Life
Emanuel and Emanuel
NEJM 1994;330:540-544.
FULL TEXT  

Rationing and the Americans With Disabilities Act
Orentlicher
JAMA 1994;271:308-314.
ABSTRACT  

Managed Competition and the Patient-Physician Relationship
Emanuel and Brett
NEJM 1993;329:879-882.
FULL TEXT  

High-Technology Cardiac Procedures: The Impact of Service Availability on Service Use in New York State
Blustein
JAMA 1993;270:344-349.
ABSTRACT  

Community-Oriented Primary Care: The Cornerstone of Health Care Reform
Wright
JAMA 1993;269:2544-2547.
ABSTRACT  

Priorities in Oregon-Reply
Fisher et al.
JAMA 1992;268:1268-1268.
ABSTRACT  

Joint Report of the Council on Scientific Affairs and the Council on Medical Service: Technology Assessment in Medicine
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:46-50.
ABSTRACT  

Should the Health Care Forest Be Selectively Thinned by Physicians or Clear Cut by Payers?
Welch
ANN INTERN MED 1991;115:223-226.
ABSTRACT  

Assessing Medicare's Prospective Payment System for Hospitals
Chulis
Med Care Res Rev 1991;48:167-206.
 

Overcoming the Prejudice Against Establishing a National Health Care System
Botelho
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:863-869.
ABSTRACT  

The Initial Impact of the Medicare Prospective Payment System on U.S. Health Care: A Review of the Literature
Feinglass and Holloway
Med Care Res Rev 1991;48:91-115.
 

Applying Brakes to the Runaway American Health Care System: A Proposed Agenda
Davies and Felder
JAMA 1990;263:73-76.
ABSTRACT  

Fiscal Scarcity and the Inevitability of Bedside Budget Balancing
Morreim
Arch Intern Med 1989;149:1012-1015.
ABSTRACT  

Health Care Financing Policy for Hospitalized Pediatric Patients
Munoz et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1989;143:312-315.
ABSTRACT  

Old Age and New Policy
Callahan
JAMA 1989;261:905-906.
ABSTRACT  

Surgonomics: Health Care Financing Policy for Hospitalized Otolaryngology Patients
Munoz et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:1317-1320.
ABSTRACT  

Predicting and Evaluating Patient Outcomes
Knaus and Nash
ANN INTERN MED 1988;109:521-522.
ABSTRACT  

Withholding Medical Treatment From the Severely Demented Patient: Decisional Processes and Cost Implications
Wray et al.
Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1980-1984.
ABSTRACT  

Is Medical Care Different? Old Questions, New Answers
Pauly
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1988;13:227-237.
ABSTRACT  

Halfway Competitive Markets and Ineffective Regulation: The American Health Care System
Altman and Rodwin
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1988;13:323-339.
ABSTRACT  

The Inevitable Failure of Cost-Containment Strategies
Bader
JAMA 1987;257:2029-2029.
ABSTRACT  

The Inevitable Failure of Cost-Containment Strategies
Albert
JAMA 1987;257:2029-2029.
ABSTRACT  

The Inevitable Failure of Cost-Containment Strategies
Samuel
JAMA 1987;257:2029-2030.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.