You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 257 No. 23, June 19, 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Brief Reports
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Supine Cross-Table Lateral Chest Roentgenogram for the Detection of Pericardial Effusion

James A. Heinsimer, MD; Gary J. Collins, MD; Marilyn H. Burkman, RDMS; Leroy Roberts, Jr, MD; James T. T. Chen, MD

JAMA. 1987;257(23):3266-3268.


Abstract

We performed a prospective, blinded, controlled study to test the hypothesis that supine cross-table lateral chest roentgenograms might have an advantage over conventional lateral chest roentgenograms for the detection of pericardial effusion using the epicardial fat stripe sign. In comparison with echocardiography as the gold standard, we found that supine cross-table lateral chest roentgenograms had greater sensitivity (51%) for pericardial effusions than conventional lateral chest roentgenograms (sensitivity, 31%). Specificity was essentially the same for both techniques. A large pericardial effusion was more readily detected by supine cross-table lateral chest roentgenograms (86%) than by the conventional lateral chest roentgenograms (36%). We conclude that a supine cross-table lateral chest roentgenogram should be included in the evaluation of patients with suspected pericardial effusion or in patients in whom a large cardiac silhouette is detected on a standard chest roentgenogram.

(JAMA 1987;257:3266-3268)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Cardiology, the Departments of Medicine (Drs Heinsimer, Collins, and Burkman) and Radiology (Drs Roberts and Chen), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. Dr Heinsimer is now with the Division of Cardiology, the Department of Medicine, Harper Hospital, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Noninvasive Cardiology Laboratory, Harper Hospital, 3990 John R St, Detroit, MI 48201 (Dr Heinsimer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Does This Patient With a Pericardial Effusion Have Cardiac Tamponade?
Roy et al.
JAMA 2007;297:1810-1818.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases Executive Summary: The Task Force on the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology
Task Force members et al.
Eur Heart J 2004;25:587-610.
FULL TEXT  

Use of Methodological Standards in Diagnostic Test Research: Getting Better but Still Not Good
Reid et al.
JAMA 1995;274:645-651.
ABSTRACT  

Roentgenograms in Pericardial Effusion
Dunn et al.
JAMA 1987;258:1890-1890.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.