You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 257 No. 9, March 6, 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

How Do Physicians Adapt When the Coronary Care Unit Is Full?

A Prospective Multicenter Study

Harry P. Selker, MD, MSPH; John L. Griffith, MS; Fredrick J. Dorey, PhD; Ralph B. D'Agostino, PhD

JAMA. 1987;257(9):1181-1185.


Abstract

Reducing the numbers of coronary care unit (CCU) beds would decrease expensive unnecessary admissions, but might also block appropriate admissions. To study how physicians adapt to limited CCU beds, we compared their decisions to admit patients to the CCU when the CCU was full with those made when the CCU was not full. We studied 4479 patients who presented with symptoms suggesting acute cardiac ischemia to six New England hospital emergency rooms over 16 months. Of the 2931 patients found on follow-up not to have acute ischemia, 33% of those presenting when the CCU was not full were admitted to the CCU vs 24% of such patients presenting when the CCU was full (P =.0005), a 27% drop. Of the 725 patients proving to have angina pectoris, 74% of those presenting when the CCU was not full were admitted to the CCU vs 62% of such patients presenting when the CCU was full (P =.007), a 16% reduction. Of the 823 patients found to have myocardial infarction, 90% were admitted to the CCU both when the CCU was not full and when it was full. Importantly, for no group did mortality increase when the CCU was full. These data suggest that physicians can safely adapt to substantial reductions in the availability of CCU beds.

(JAMA 1987;257:1181-1185)



Author Affiliations

From the Multicenter Cardiology and Health Services Research Unit, formerly at Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Departments of Medicine, UCLA and Cedars-Sinai Medical Centers, Los Angeles, and the Cardiology Department, Boston City Hospital; now at the Divisions of General Medicine and Clinical Decision Making, Department of Medicine, New England Medical Center Hospitals, Boston (Drs Selker, Dorey, and D'Agostino, and Mr Griffith); and the Department of Mathematics, Boston University (Dr D'Agostino and Mr Griffith). Dr Selker is an American College of Physicians Teaching and Research Scholar.


Footnotes

The opinions, conclusions, and proposals herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Reprint requests to Multicenter Cardiology and Health Services Research Unit, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111 (Dr Selker).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Patients Readmitted to ICUs* : A Systematic Review of Risk Factors and Outcomes
Rosenberg and Watts
Chest 2000;118:492-502.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should we establish chest pain observation units in the UK? A systematic review and critical appraisal of the literature
Goodacre
Emerg. Med. J. 2000;17:1-6.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Intensive Care Units for Patients With Low Severity of Illness
Rosenthal et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1144-1151.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Use of Empiric Clinical Data in the Evaluation of Practice Guidelines for Unstable Angina
Katz et al.
JAMA 1996;276:1568-1574.
ABSTRACT  

Prediction of the Need for Intensive Care in Patients Who Come to Emergency Departments with Acute Chest Pain
Goldman et al.
NEJM 1996;334:1498-1504.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethical Considerations in the Allocation of Organs and Other Scarce Medical Resources Among Patients
Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:29-40.
ABSTRACT  

A Comparison of Management Patterns after Acute Myocardial Infarction in Canada and the United States
Rouleau et al.
NEJM 1993;328:779-784.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Health Care Resource Allocation Debate: Defining Our Terms
Hadorn and Brook
JAMA 1991;266:3328-3331.
ABSTRACT  

One Year's Experience With a Noninvasively Monitored Intermediate Care Unit for Pulmonary Patients
Krieger et al.
JAMA 1990;264:1143-1146.
ABSTRACT  

Early "Step-Down" Transfer of Low-Risk Patients with Chest Pain: A Controlled Interventional Trial
Weingarten et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1990;113:283-289.
ABSTRACT  

Utilization Strategies for Intensive Care Units
Kalb and Miller
JAMA 1989;261:2389-2395.
ABSTRACT  

The Early Effect of Medicare's Prospective Payment System on the Use of Medical Intensive Care Services in Three Community Hospitals
Mayer-Oakes et al.
JAMA 1988;260:3146-3149.
ABSTRACT  

The Coronary Care Unit Turns 25: Historical Trends and Future Directions
LEE and GOLDMAN
ANN INTERN MED 1988;108:887-894.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.