You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 258 No. 10, September 11, 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Council Report
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

In Vivo Diagnostic Testing and Immunotherapy for Allergy

Report I, Part I, of the Allergy Panel

Council on Scientific Affairs

JAMA. 1987;258(10):1363-1367.


Abstract

The diagnosis and treatment of allergic disease constitute a particularly difficult and complex field in medicine, a field that has been complicated further by the promulgation and the use of unproved procedures and/or the inappropriate use of proved procedures. This report is the first in a series of reports prepared by a multidisciplinary panel appointed by the Council on Scientific Affairs of the American Medical Association. It discusses the necessity for proper clinical trials to generate reproducible results under similar conditions to adequately prove the validity of various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. In vivo immunologic tests have been shown to be reliable and valid diagnostic tools and include skin tests with standardized allergenic extracts by prick, puncture, and intradermal techniques, skin end-point titration, and patch testing for contact allergic dermatitis. Other clinically useful physiologic tests include the exercise tolerance test, methacholine and/or histamine inhalation challenge test, and other inhalation tests utilizing either nasal or bronchial delivery. Oral challenge testing has also been utilized and includes open, single-blind, or double-blind techniques, depending on the requirements of the patient being studied. The second article is a continuation of the first report, and describes other challenge tests and unproved procedures. The third report of this series evaluates in vitro tests for allergy.

(JAMA 1987;258:1363-1367)



Author Affiliations

From the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, Chicago.


Footnotes

This report was submitted to the AMA House of Delegates in December 1986 as an informational report.

This report is not intended to be construed or to serve as a standard of medical care. Standards of medical care are determined on the basis of all of the facts and circumstances involved in an individual case and are subject to change as scientific knowledge and technology advance and patterns of practice evolve. This report reflects the views of the scientific literature as of December 1986.

Reprint requests to Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, 535 N Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60610 (William R. Hendee, PhD).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnostic Tests for Patients with Suspected Allergic Disease: Utility and Limitations
VanArsdel and Larson
ANN INTERN MED 1989;110:304-312.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnostic Testing and Immunotherapy for Allergy-Reply
Allergy Panel of the Council on Scientific Affairs
JAMA 1988;260:342-342.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.