A prospective two-year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury. An objective assessment procedure

T. G. Mayer, R. J. Gatchel, H. Mayer, N. D. Kishino, J. Keeley and V. Mooney

One hundred sixteen consecutive patients entered a functional restoration treatment program for chronic low back pain and were compared with 72 patients not treated. A two-year follow-up survey reached more than 85% of both groups; its findings were compared with earlier results of a five-month and one-year follow-up. Analysis demonstrated that 87% of the treatment group was actively working after two years, as compared with only 41% of the nontreatment comparison group. Moreover, about twice as many of the comparison group patients had additional spine surgery relative to the treatment group. The comparison group continued with an approximately five times higher rate of patient visits to health professionals in the second year as the treatment group. Also, treatment group reinjury rates were no higher than those expected in the general population, while nontreatment subjects had a higher incidence of reinjury. Finally, a small treatment "dropout" group did poorest of all, with results in almost all areas even worse than those of the comparison group patients.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Functional Restoration for a Chronic Lumbar Disk Extrusion With Associated Radiculopathy
Hahne and Ford
ptjournal 2006;86:1668-1680.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fat Content of Lumbar Paraspinal Muscles in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and in Asymptomatic Volunteers: Quantification with MR Spectroscopy
Mengiardi et al.
Radiology 2006;240:786-792.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High Pain Ratings Predict Treatment Failure in Chronic Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders
McGeary et al.
JBJS 2006;88:317-325.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Unremitting Health-Care-Utilization Outcomes of Tertiary Rehabilitation of Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Disorders
Proctor et al.
JBJS 2004;86:62-69.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early intervention for acute back injury: can we finally develop an evidence-based approach?
Smith et al.
Clin Rehabil 2002;16:1-11.
ABSTRACT  

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review
Guzman et al.
BMJ 2001;322:1511-1516.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-Term Disability and Return to Work Among Patients Who Have a Herniated Lumbar Disc: The Effect of Disability Compensation
ATLAS et al.
JBJS 2000;82:4-15.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Concepts Review - Lumbar Arthrodesis for the Treatment of Back Pain
HANLEY and DAVID
JBJS 1999;81:716-30.
FULL TEXT  

Intensive dynamic training for females with chronic neck/shoulder pain. A randomized controlled trial
Randlov et al.
Clin Rehabil 1998;12:200-210.
ABSTRACT  

Back pain
Ellis
BMJ 1995;310:1220-1220.
FULL TEXT  

Effect of resistance training on lumbar extension strength
Pollock et al.
Am J Sports Med 1989;17:624-629.
ABSTRACT